User talk:Rebismusic

Rebismusic, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rebismusic! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Marsha P. Johnson that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have not removed it, but I suggest that you do so. Comment on content, not users. Meters (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mileyboo3 (talk • contribs) 04:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Hi there, since you keep sending me messages that I and fellow editor Mileyboo are supposedly being "transphobic", which we were not, in relation to Marsha's own words in her final interview, I like to send you this page where you have constantly been doing: Wikipedia:No_original_research. Your constant reverts using original research is violating a Wikipedia rule. That also includes adding pictures and writing a paragraph that, for the most part, you have failed to cite your sources. While YouTube videos are sometimes okay to use, you need more than that for your sources. So I thought I finally send you this since you seem determined on ignoring it for your own neutral view points, which is not an attack on you, it's just the way to see things and using your (questionable for now until you can really prove it) association with Christopher Street neighbors who knew Marsha and Sylvia. Have a nice day. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 17:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh now you're harassing me too?

Don't make me report you. Read this and stop insulting people: Wikipedia:Harassment. Thank you. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 05:36, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i insulted you; that was inappropriate.

It is frustrating to watch Marsha's fragile history be formed using source material that is transphobic. It is hard watching reference to transgender leaders who admire johnson be deleted. Rebismusic (talk) 06:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Marsha P. Johnson. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Stop making personal attacks. Discuss the issues on the article's talk page, and don't make any personal insults. Meters (talk) 06:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't reach consensus on the talk page then ask for a third opinion or take it to dispute resolution, but don't call a content dispute vandalism, don't call other editors cockroaches, and don't attribute motivations to their actions. And the line "there will be 100 more that will pick up where i left off" sounds like a threat to of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Meters (talk) 06:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Marsha P. Johnson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Bumping to imm. Days of personal attacks. Meters (talk) 06:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Marsha P. Johnson. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note it is not acceptable to refer to other editors as cockroaches, and any further incidences will result in a much longer block. Thank you — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rebismusic. You have new messages at Talk:Marsha_P._Johnson.
Message added 08:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Slazenger (Contact Me) 08:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Conflict of Interest

Please note that your claim of being involved in the production of the film here [1] means you have a conflict of interest. That is fine and doesn't prohibit you from editing, but history has shown that people with COIs that edit articles directly tend to get too passionate and end up in edit wars and the like. Because of this, policy states that direct editing is strongly discouraged. The block above demonstrates why it is discouraged as that is a common outcome. I suggest you use the talk page more and edit directly less. No matter what you think you know, your edits aren't special or protected or given higher status than that of an IP editor, or any other editor. You need to read WP:BRD and work with others on the talk page, convincing first, then edit. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rebismusic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]