User talk:Reatom2

Welcome!

Hello, Reatom2! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 16:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

February 2024

Hello, I'm Bigcheese26. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Groundhog have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Bigcheese26 (talk) 14:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

/ Reatom2 (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Groundhog. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bigcheese26 (talk) 14:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 14:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dude i edited like 5 characters and you're saying that's vandalism @Widr: Reatom2 (talk) 15:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reatom2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i randomly accused of vandalism for trying to fix a small sentence and this is indefinite ban with account creation blocked?? why!!!! not fair!! how did i even vandalize the groundhog article Reatom2 (talk) 14:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I fail to see how changing "Many of these predators are successful stealth stalkers so can catch groundhogs by surprise before the large rodents can escape to their burrows" to "Many of these predators are successful stealth stalkers,, so tey can catch groundhogs by surprise before the large rodents can escape to their burrows" is anything other than vandalism. The sentence was fine before. Adding doubled commas, something that is never grammatically correct in English, and "tey", a measure of length for rope, was at all helpful. Yamla (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The sentence didn't make sense when I read it so i changed it, i made a tiny typo where i missed the h and you're being rude for no reason here. Reatom2 (talk) 15:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you're basically making fun of me for making a tiny mistake @Yamla: 2 character difference between an otherwise fine sentence is vandalism and deserves an indefinite block? really?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reatom2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i made a typo in the word "they" and i really just can't see how that is vandalism, it was a mistake i totally missed PLZ UNBLOCK mE plZ PLZ Reatom2 (talk) 17:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even if I accepted your version of this, you didn't go back and correct it immediately. Not only that, you reverted someone's attempt to remove your typo. It seems that Wikipedia needs to be protected from your typos unless you can tell us what you will do to prevent them. 331dot (talk) 17:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reatom2 (talk) 17:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC) i made a typo once so im not allowed to use this website anymore?[reply]

You are free to read Wikipedia as much as you wish. Edit it, no, you can't. 331dot (talk) 20:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reatom2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it's not vandalism to make a 1 letter spelling mistake Reatom2 (talk) 17:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the checkuser information provided below, an unblock does not seem appropriate without it being directly addressed. Kinu ^t/_c 18:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You aren't blocked for making a single 1 letter spelling mistake. You deliberately reintroduced your errors after they were fixed by another editor. --Yamla (talk) 18:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also note you are Technically indistinguishable from the editor previously blocked for vandalism, OkieHoi. You'll want to address this, too. --Yamla (talk) 18:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what does that mean Reatom2 (talk) 18:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what is technically indistinguishable Reatom2 (talk) 13:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i can't find any information about that Reatom2 (talk) 13:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that was me yes i should have said that when i first got blocked Reatom2 (talk) 14:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😭 Reatom2 (talk) 14:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reatom2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i didnt mean it ong bro Reatom2 (talk) 1:08 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Aside from the total inadequacy and unconvingness of this request, there is the abuse of multiple accounts. I cannot see unblocking before August 3, 2024. At that time, you will need to describe how your edits merited a block, what you would do instead, and what constructive edits you would make. Please see WP:SO. Thanks-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.