User talk:Readeratbest

October 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 21:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

‘’’ keep ‘’’ what am I supposed to do? Like never start editing? I have to start from somewhere. I just started.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Readeratbest (talk • contribs)

Why do you keep on saying "keep"?!? You could start by not blanking out other people's votes when they disagreed with you. --Yamla (talk) 21:32, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google books has proofs of his books. Please check. The comments are biased.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Readeratbest (talk • contribs)

That's irrelevant. We aren't judging the author, we are judging the article. Nor is it relevant here. You may convince me, but that doesn't matter. Make your arguments about the article (not about the author) over on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveed Qazi. --Yamla (talk) 21:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

well I think, the article should be kept.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Readeratbest (talk • contribs)

Great. Go justify why the article should be kept. Keep your arguments to the article, though, not about the author. I should also note, if you are found to be in any way related to Stonehousekeeper (talk · contribs) or FifthHouseGuy (talk · contribs), your arguments will be removed. --Yamla (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because of abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of the talk page of your ORIGINAL account, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]