User talk:Rctay

Image Tagging for Image:Cadiz.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cadiz.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:41, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

takashi asahina translation

Hi. I've had a glance at the Japanese article on Takashi Asahina. To be honest, I can't see myself translating it unless an unexpected amount of free time emerges in my upcoming final year at university. I'll bear it in mind, though. DTOx 16:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Theodor Billroth

I noted your edit changing "became fast friends" to "became friends quickly". You should know, though, that in this context, fast does not mean quick, but rather

firm: unwavering in devotion to friend or vow or cause; "a firm ally"; "loyal supporters"; "the true-hearted soldier...of Tippecanoe"- Campaign song for William Henry Harrison; "fast friends"

(Oxford)

In this sense, the usage is not colloquial at all, but, if anything, highbrow and snooty.

regards, --Ravpapa 05:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes you're right, my reason is incorrect, but i believe the change still stands, since 'fast' can also mean "to take advantage by telling lies", as in fast and loose, or even "in quick succession", as in became and stopped being friends quickly. If quick or firm is meant/intended, then they should be used, rather than fast which gives rise to such ambiguity/multiple meanings.

From the context it is not immediately obvious that firm is meant. Thus ambiguity is present.

You might say Brahms was a steadfast and firm friend, and thus no ambiguity is present, but a reader who had not read the article on may not be aware of this, so i still stand by my claim that it is ambiguous.--Rctay 07:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. That's why I didn't change it back. --Ravpapa 07:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for pointing it out anyway!--Rctay 07:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fast friends is "loyal, devoted friends", "firm in adherence", at least in my Webster. Lantonov 11:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

as pointed out earlier, you are right, however ambiguities remain. if rephrased, they will not be there. thus the change.--Rctay 11:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rctay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]