User talk:Rcrump0109

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Dr. Evil into Douglas Arnold Jr.. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Gulumeemee (talk) 03:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Douglas Arnold Jr.

The article Douglas Arnold Jr. has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jianhui67^T★C 03:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Douglas Arnold Jr.

Hello Rcrump0109,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Douglas Arnold Jr. for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Douglas Arnold Jr., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]