User talk:Razvan3c

September 2013

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tottenham Hotspur F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Steadionul steaua are 28,365 de locuri

pe site au pus un numar rotund. verifica la plan stadion.

sector 1-744
sector 2-682
sector 3-682
sector 4-616
sector 5-306
sector 6-306
sector 7-619
sector 8-682
sector 9-682
sector 10-682
sector 11-682
sector 12-682
sector 13-682
sector 14-615
sector 15-313
sector 16-306
sector 17-615
sector 18-682
sector 19-682
sector 20-682
sector 21-651
sector 22-432
sector 23-651
sector 24-682
sector 25-682
sector 26-682
sector 27-611
sector 28-304
sector 29-304
sector 30-614
sector 31-682
sector 32-682
sector 33-682
sector 34-682
sector 35-682
sector 36-682
sector 37-613
sector 38-308
sector 39-304
sector 40-614
sector 41-682
sector 42-682
sector 43-744
sector A-483
SECTOR B-506
SECTOR C-483
PRESA-126
loje-440
fotolii-733

total 28,365 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.176.163 (talk) 06:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WikiFlorentin Pham-Huy

Hello Razvan3c,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged WikiFlorentin Pham-Huy for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LouiseS1979 (talk) 10:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Florentin Pham-Huy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cristian Pușcaș

A tag has been placed on Cristian Pușcaș, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:30, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexandru Aldea (footballer)

The article Alexandru Aldea (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cristian Pușcaș

The article Cristian Pușcaș has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cristian Pușcaș

A tag has been placed on Cristian Pușcaș, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 10:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexandru Aldea (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexandru Aldea (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandru Aldea (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Andrei (talk) 14:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SALUT, COPILULE

E greu sa pui numele corect? sau vrei mereu sa vina cineva dupa tine sa corecteze???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.115.189.76 (talk) 09:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cristian Pușcaș

A tag has been placed on Cristian Pușcaș, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:38, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of articles

Repeatedly recreating articles on non-notable subjects, especially those deleted following community discussion, is disruptive editing. If you continue to do so, as you did most recently with Cristian Pușcaș‎‎, you may be blocked from editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:47, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 5 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Andrei Prepeliță page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with Cristian Onțel. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ionuț Poiană for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ionuț Poiană is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ionuț Poiană until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:59, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ionuț Poiană

A tag has been placed on Ionuț Poiană, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of articles

Please stop recreating articles that have been deleted following a discussion, as you did with Ionuț Poiană. Doing this repeatedly is disruptive and may get you blocked from editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bogdan Măcriș, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As I've already explained to you, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source since most of its content is user-generated. Please stop citing the website in articles. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bogdan Măcriș, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of articles

This is your final warning. If you continue to recreate articles that have been deleted through deletion discussions without addressing the underlying concern, as you have done most recently with Ionuț Poiană, you will be blocked from editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:01, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ionuț Poiană concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ionuț Poiană, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ionuț Poiană

Hello. A tag has been placed on Ionuț Poiană, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Ionuț Poiană. Repeatedly recreating deleted articles, is disruptive and will get you blocked if this continues. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gabriel Simion

The article Gabriel Simion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

You don't seem to understand this, so let me take a moment to explain. In order to have an article on Wikipedia, a subject must meet certain inclusion standards called notability. For footballers, the relevant notability guidelines says that footballers who have played for their country's senior national team, or in one of the fully professional leagues listed here are notable. It also clarifies that played in this context means having appeared in a match, not merely being on the bench or part of the team's squad. For the articles you've created this means that these footballers do not meet the guidelines until and unless the make their debut for Steaua. I hope that clears things up. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please don't cite the website in articles, as you did with 2016–17 FC Steaua București season. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Razvan3c. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adrian Petre

A tag has been placed on Adrian Petre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of articles again

You've received a number of warnings about this before, so let me stress again: recreating articles immediately after they're deleted is disruptive and may get you blocked from editing if you continue to do so. If you disagree with a deletion, there are forms to contest them, namely deletion review for speedy deletions and deletion discussions, and Requests for undeletion for proposed deletions. Please make use of them rather than simply recreating articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ionuț Poiană

Hello, Razvan3c. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ionuț Poiană".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adrian Petre

A tag has been placed on Adrian Petre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gnohere

Pot sa stiu de ce ai sters fraza despre hat-trickul cu ACS Poli? BTW, vad ca editezi pagina Stelei dar nu ai observat ca cineva a schimbat numele oficial de Fotbal Club FCSB in Fotbal Club Steaua Bucuresti.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 18:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 18:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Razvan3c. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Szecui

The article Paul Szecui has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ștefan Pacionel

The article Ștefan Pacionel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laurențiu Ardelean

The article Laurențiu Ardelean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Steaua / FCSB

Te rog frumos sa faci paginile inapoi asa cum le lasasem eu. Am stabilit cu alti useri ca vom scrie FCSB pe articole deoarece asta e numele oficial al clubului. Asa cum la italieni apare Internazionale dar pagina clubului se numeste Inter Milan.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 14:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 14:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Razvan3c. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Adrian Petre does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! _Mrwoogi010 ^✉ 15:47, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Liga I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CFR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Florinel Coman

Pot sa stiu de ce ai sters toate informatiile cu ce a facut Coman la FCSB (sutul cu Lazio, gol si asist in prima etapa, golgheter la jumatatea sezonului, locul trei in ancheta GSP) si ai adaugat porcariile alea cu “one of the brightest prospects”, asemanarea cu Kylian Mbappe si clauza de 100 de milioane?

1. Daca e unul dintre cei mai buni tineri din Romania nu trebuie adaugat in descriere, ci in Style of play cu SURSE. Plus ca suna a publicitate si exagerare ce scrii tu. 2. Asemanarea cu Mbappe a fost facuta de Becali ca sa il vanda, unul e cel mai valoros jucator din lume si celalalt joaca in Liga I! Din nou, publicitate facuta de Becali si o comparatie aberanta. 3. Clauza de 100 de milioane e trecuta deja in articol, nu are nicio relevanta in descriere si la niciun fotbalist nu am vazut sa fie trecuta in descriere! Asta pe langa faptul ca e excesiv de mare, asa pot sa imi fac si eu la Liga 6 echipa si sa ii pun lu’ unu 300 de milioane clauza, ce relevanta are pt. Wikipedia??? 4. Articolul ala cu Manchester City e o prostie, au preluat o informatie bagata tot de presa din Romania ca sa ii faca publicitate. Este foarte ok sa adaugi zvonuri, dar nu d-astea de care stim ca nu sunt sanse sa se realizeze. Citeste si tu articole de la alti fotbalisti mari si vezi cum arata un articol adevarat, cu gramatica si pus la punct doar cu informatia necesara, nu mai strica articole de capul tau!8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 13:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not using sources

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mihai Udrea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mihai Udrea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mihai Udrea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David Miculescu

Poti sa mi spui de ce ai sters informatiile despre debutul si primul gol ale lui Miculescu? Si de ce insisti ca are 104 meciuri de campionat cand pe Soccerway sunt 108? De unde vine diferenta de patru?8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 21:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Scuza-ma! Era o diferenta intre soccerway si tranfermarkt. Acum este in regula, cu 108 meciuri. Daca tot ai modificat, era cazul sa si modifici tabelul pe sezoane, ca nu bateau insumarile si datele. Am actualizat eu acum acolo. E OK. Razvan3c (talk) 10:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

De asemenea, nu mai face Overlinking. Daca Liga I sau sezonul 2022-23 au fost deja link-uite in Club statistics nu le mai faci link si a doua oara.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 22:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invited to tell your opinion

Hi! Some users, fans of the rivals sides, are trying to to change the page FCSB into FC FCSB. See https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:FCSB! End-of-season-updates (talk) 17:26, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FCSB is the real name. Razvan3c (talk) 18:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 FCSB season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valentin Crețu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Florinel Coman

Poti sa mi spui de ce mi ai sters edit urile pe pagina lui Coman? Am stat foarte mult s o fac sa arate bine, totul are referinte si nu inteleg ce te a deranjat. In cazul in care era ceva naspa puteai sa stergi doar partea aia, nu tot ce am muncit. Daca mai faci asa ceva inca o data te raportez.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 11:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darius Olaru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2022–23 Liga I into 2023–24 Liga I. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FC_Steaua_Bucure%C8%99ti

Questionable page please see 93.143.52.223 (talk) 17:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Canvassing and POV-pushing. The Banner talk 18:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mihai Toma moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mihai Toma. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 23:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 FCSB season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Octavian Popescu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mihai Toma

Hello, Razvan3c. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mihai Toma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mihai Toma

Hello, Razvan3c. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mihai Toma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]