User talk:Razool
Eu sunt din Bucuresti si ma chinui sa fac ceva pentru statiunea Ranca deoarece am vazut ca statiunea nu este promovata, dar daca tu nu consideri important asta este problema ta (link-ul nu era vizibil). Multumesc oricum ca ai fost foarte atent si sa nu lasi si pe altii sa scrie ! Esti egoist ! Sunt deja pe prima pagina la Google dupa cuvantul "ranca" asa ca nu am nevoie de reclama cum consideri tu ! Multumesc Hascu
- 1.Adevarul e cu totul altul si stii foarte bine.
- 2.Oricum ai pune problema era vorba de reclama
- 3.Daca vrei sa faci ceva pentru Ranca cu adevarat mai bine scrie un articol
- 4.Putin ma intereseaza care e rankul sitului pe Google
- PS. Linkul era foarte vizibil si irelevant pentru varinata engleza a articolului --Razool (talk) 12:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
{{Romania-hist-stub}}
[edit]Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 07:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Romania and the Mongol Invasion of 1241
[edit]
I have nominated Romania and the Mongol Invasion of 1241, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romania and the Mongol Invasion of 1241. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dahn (talk) 20:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Mongols
[edit]Răspunsul e foarte simplu: aici se citează sursele. Plus că nu ştiu chiar dacă se poate vorbi de un popor român în sec. XIII, dar chiar şi dacă se poate, esenţialul e să cităm sursele. - Biruitorul Talk 19:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sursele româneşti sunt la fel de valabile. Doar pe ce se bazează, de pildă, Romanian general election, 1946? Hai să facem un compromis: aştept 3-4 zile să puneţi sursele. Că lipsesc în alte secţii nu justifică lipsa lor în secţia adăugată de dvs. - Biruitorul Talk 20:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Mersi pentru surse, şi îmi cer scuze dacă am apărut prea agresiv iniţial. Avem prea puţini contribuitori serioşi despre România aici, deci vreau să vă încurajez. În acelaşi timp, contează şi calitatea. - Biruitorul Talk 04:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Attacks in the article Category:Şmecheri de Wikipedia România
[edit]
Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Category:Şmecheri de Wikipedia România. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Turbojet (talk) 11:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Dacia
[edit]
--Codrin.B (talk) 00:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Romania
[edit] |
--Codrin.B (talk) 04:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Category:Romanian mountain resorts
[edit]Category:Romanian mountain resorts, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 23:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Knowledge consistency checker
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Knowledge consistency checker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc756899%28v=ws.10%29.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)
[edit]Seasons Greetings,
This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.
Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.
While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.
Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.
This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Wikipedia:Translators available list.
Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 06:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Razool. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)