User talk:Raysonik

Nomination of Infodynamics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Infodynamics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infodynamics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Unfamiliar Occurrence

Hello Raysonik. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Unfamiliar Occurrence.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Unfamiliar Occurrence}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Infodyanmics, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Samuel Tarling (talk) 00:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Infodyanmics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Infodyanmics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Samuel Tarling (talk) 00:04, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infodynamics

It is three years since WP:Articles for deletion/Infodynamics so you may well be able to make a better case now. I have restored the page to Draft:Infodynamics so that you can work on it.

As it was deleted after a deletion discussion, it should not be restored directly to the main encyclopedia. When your draft is ready, let me know; I may decide that it is now OK to go, but more likely I will list it at WP:Deletion review, the forum for appeals against deletion, or if I think DRV would say: "restore it and re-list for another Articles for deletion discussion" I may do that directly. Unfortunately I shall be away until about 25th August: if your draft is ready and you want to proceed before then, go direct to WP:Deletion review, providing a link to the draft, and explain that I am away and have told you to do that.

It may help if I tell you why I would say delete if the existing article were relisted at Articles for Deletion now, and I had done some research.

You say "Authors such as Dr. Ray Mansuri and Dr. Stanley Salthe also intend on further developing and popularizing such a term and concept with in the next few years." Good luck to them, but Wikipedia is not here to help with that. Relevant policy quotes are WP:NEO: "Articles on neologisms are commonly deleted, as these articles are often created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term" and WP:No original research: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."

For an article to be accepted, there would need to be evidence that Infodynamics is a term already in use, with a common agreed meaning, outside the small group that originated it. In searches like this I see mainly the same few names (Mansuri, Ceruti, Saithe, Rubin).

There are certainly several companies called by the name: Infodynamics LLC, Infodynamics, Infodynamic.net, Infodynamics.com; but it is not clear to me whether there is anything in common between their operations and Mr Mansuri's idea, or whether they have simply picked a trendy-sounding buzzword to use as a name. If the latter, their existence is no help.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Infodynamics (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Infodynamics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 09:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Raysonik, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 09:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Infodynamics

Hello, Raysonik. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Infodynamics".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 03:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]