User talk:RaymondYee

Please feel free to talk to me here

I'm starting to get into editing the Wikipedia now. If you'd like to communicate with me, fee free to do so here. RaymondYee (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome from Acetic

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, RaymondYee! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:

There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk Pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Acetic '^Acid 21:51, September 5, 2005 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! RaymondYee, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Ocaasi^{t | c} 19:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Raymond

It was a pleasure to meet you today. Please do not hesitate to ask me a question at any time. If I don't know the answer, I will do my best to point you in the right direction. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:54, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley

Saturday, April 5 - WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley - You are invited!

The University of California, Berkeley's Berkeley Center for New Media is hosting our first edit-a-thon, facilitated by WikiWoman Sarah Stierch, on April 5! This event, focused on engaging women to contribute to Wikipedia, will feature a brief Wikipedia policy and tips overview, followed by a fast-paced energetic edit-a-thon. Everyone is welcome to attend.

Please bring your laptop and be prepared to edit about women and women's history!

The event is April 5, from 1-5 PM, at the Berkeley Center for New Media Commons at Moffitt Library.

You must RSVP here - see you there! SarahStierch (talk) 00:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janet A. W. Elliott (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janet A. W. Elliott and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:09, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Janet A. W. Elliott

Thank you for leaving a message regarding my rejection of your draft. I looked over WP:NPROF, and I now see my mistake; I had thought that a secondary source was needed, but this clarification, For documenting that a person has been elected member or fellow (but not for a judgement of whether or not that membership/fellowship is prestigious), publications of the electing institution are considered a reliable source, does indeed clean it up. If you want to resubmit and ping me after you have done so, I will accept your revision.
At the same time, I will suggest that you create an infobox, add a date or year of birth if you can find one, put the inline citations after punctuation like periods and commas, and clarify what a distinguished professor in the second sentence. Are you saying that Elliott is "distinguished", or is that part of the title they hold? If the former, you should remove that as it would not be NPOV language. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:19, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul -- thank you for taking a look at the draft and reconsidering your decision so promptly -- I really appreciate it. I have clarified that Elliott's title is actually University of Alberta Distinguished Professor, fixed the placement of the citations wrt to punctuation, and started an infobox. I resubmitted the draft (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Draft%3AJanet_A._W._Elliott&oldid=1170004988) as requested. RaymondYee (talk) 17:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janet A. W. Elliott has been accepted

Janet A. W. Elliott, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article in the first place and working with me to get it over the finish line. I feel encouraged to continue writing new articles. RaymondYee (talk) 18:14, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]