Jump to content

User talk:Ravenstar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Child's Play International, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. DWZ (talkemailcontribs) 03:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Welcome...

Welcome!

Hello, Ravenstar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

I have also replied to your post at the Drawing board.

Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 15:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Dahlia

[edit]

Perhaps, since you're well enough acquainted with various Black Dahlia authors and the story to be able to say this, perhaps you could jump in with well referenced material from other authors? Or are you saying that the misconceptions section is wrong? If that's the case, how could a misconception be wrong, since by definition, a misconception would be an error in what one thinks about a subject? The article is seriously bereft of citations in general, perhaps you know some published work which could be used? It's decidedly better and more difficult to come into an article and contribute to it than to simply pass by and leave a negative comment on the way out. Wildhartlivie (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]