User talk:Ratz haut

Welcome!

Hello, Ratz haut, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The concept of Tempo.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:The concept of Tempo.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:The concept of Tempo.pdf

Thank you for uploading File:The concept of Tempo.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Steel1943 (talk) 23:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:The concept of Tempo.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:The concept of Tempo.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 13:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Accelerator hypothesis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Accelerator hypothesis. Thanks! JQTriple7 ^talk 08:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Accelerator hypothesis (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Accelerator hypothesis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ratz haut, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:The concept of Tempo.pdf

Hello, Ratz haut. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:The concept of Tempo.pdf — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Accelerator hypothesis (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It's still way to technical and as a result too difficult to understand for people who are not an expert in the matter. Moreover, I don't see convincing proof of the notability of this theory.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Accelerator hypothesis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

T v x1 21:17, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Accelerator hypothesis has been accepted

Accelerator hypothesis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tseung Kwan O (talk) 19:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Improving your article Accelerator hypothesis

Thank you Ratz Haut for your efforts in constructing the WP article Accelerator Hypothesis. I am inserting a comment here to remind you that although I have accepted the article, I expect improvements to be made towards the article over the next few days/weeks so that it fits WP standards. First off, there are many red links in your article, which mean that there is no corresponding WP article for your links. If you've found a similar topic witha different name in WP, you can refer to Help:Links for some advice on how to format links. In addition, you might consider adding some articles under the tag ==See also== to further provoke interest in the topic. I understand that you've already tried your best to make the topic understandable to some one who has no prerequisite knowledge, but it might still be a bit confusing for someone who knows nothing about the topic (I myself studied Biology at high school, so I can at least catch up with what you're saying, but I doubt someone who knows nothing about Biology will understand it fully). This may take some time to polish, and of course for such professional topics, you might not be able to make it understandable, no matter how hard you try. Anyway, just try your best!

By the way, I have one last reminder for you. I remembered you mentioned something about a multi-million dollar clinical trial at the beginning of your submission. You might consider adding that to your article, or else another editor might propose it for deletion for lack of notability :) Cheers, Tseung Kwan O (talk) 19:52, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]