User talk:Rater

Sockpuppet

Then what was that? Todor →Bozhinov 13:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see... I tagged that one too and am requesting a CheckUser. Todor →Bozhinov 13:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No need to request a CheckUser. FrancisTyers just blocked me! you have just blocked an innoscent, who happens to agree with another wikipedian! Are you happy now? Rater 14:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, no need, I consulted Fran and he agreed it's too obvious to bother. Todor →Bozhinov 14:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rater (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

None given

Decline reason:

Clearly a sock of User:ElevatedStork, who is clearly a sock of User:Bonaparte. Such sockpuppets are being used abusively, so the block stands. ➨ ЯEDVERS 18:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.