User talk:Rashidzaman786

Welcome

Hello Rashidzaman786, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Rashidzaman786, good luck, and have fun. – Faizan (talk) 12:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles

Please consider our guidance on moving articles before actually relocating the things, as you just did with List of Saraiki tribes. That you also changed the purpose of the article is also taking our attitude regarding boldness perhaps a little too far. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 06:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Balochistan#Recent_changes". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EdwardH (talk) 12:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Personal biasness shown by Cyphoidbomb

I had a talk page disscussion over balouchistan Pakistan where my position was oposite from User Cyphoidbomb. All ended with a concensus but now with out being relevant to a dispute (between me and User Jasimkhanum 10 on maintaning pre dispute version of article), Cyphoidbomb started persanol revenge game. 1. He misrepresented me on ANI read https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FEdit_warring&type=revision&diff=675320060&oldid=675310006 2. He deleted pre dispute version of Khyber Pakhtunkha and took Jasimkhanum 10 side and voilated WP principle that in case of dispute a pre dispute version will be maintaned. Zmaghndstakun (talk) 03:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like that. You are right. Let's see what admin do. Fingers crossed. Rashidzaman786 (talk) 14:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They have topic banned me for 3 months. what should I do can you please give some tips ? Zmaghndstakun (talk) 17:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"They" didn't topic ban you. Ceradon topic banned you. Why are you asking an editor with less than 2 months experience editing here for advice? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because he is on DRN with me and have common stand. I can seek his advice . what is your problem ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zmaghndstakun (talk • contribs) 17:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, because LanguageXpert starts a fake conversation with his own socks by logging in and out to make them look different users.112.79.39.68 (talk) 04:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 04:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]