User talk:Rapomon

Welcome

Hello Rapomon, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! You (Talk) 21:57, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Disambiguation page for Cathedral of San Salvador

hey Rapomon - firstly, your English is fine! Secondly, I'm sorry about moving the article back, I didn't realise there was a second cathedral of that name. I've now made a disambiguation page at Cathedral of San Salvador just as you suggested. For your info; you can create a disambiguation page just like any other page. Include the relevant text, and relevant links, and at the bottom you may wish to include the template {{disambig}} so that it is clear the page is intended as a disambiguation page. Also, it would have been preferable to move the old page to Cathedral of San Salvador (Oviedo), rather than copying and pasting, since this would preserve the edit history. You can do this by clicking "move" at the top of any page.

Thanks for your contributions, hope this helps! UkPaolo 13:08, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Firebird Foundation

(copied from my talk page. -DES) The source of Firebird Foundation it's at the end of the page (external link). The text it's not protected. --Rapomon 08:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In general it is not permitted to simply copy content from a web page, even if there is no copyright notice on that site (which is what I suppose you mean by "not protected"). See Wikipedia:copyright for more on our copyright policy. As far as I could see, only the "objectives" were directly copied from the Firebird Foundation web site. i edited the page to make it celar that these are directly quoted. If any other contenr is copied form this or any other site, it should be rewritten. otherwise it may well be delted as a copyright violation. See our copyright problems page and our speedy deletion criteria. DES ^(talk) 16:20, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Salamanca

What do you mean "it is the main article?" There are other Salamanca articles that are also of rather moderately-known place. There are two municipalities in New York with the name Salamanca, for instance. "The main article" is simply your opinion, which, in my own, is slightly skewed by the fact that you come from Spain. Please respond on my talk page so I know what you have to say. JHMM13 (T | C) 20:40, 24 January 2006 (UTC) Salamanca is the most important article of the list, it's like London or Madrid, or Berlin, not Berlin, Germany. Salamanca is the place most important of the list, and not for be a spanish man. It's only my opinion. You can revert it if you want, but we have to change all the links of wikipedia refering to Salamanca, Spain. --Rapomon 20:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern European Time

Hi. Can you please explain this link addition to the Eastern European Time article? I'm not sure what EST has to do with Eastern Europe. Thanks! Monkeyman 15:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ups, it was a mistake. It have been removed. --Rapomon 16:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Eclipse_Valladolid_October_3_2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eclipse_Valladolid_October_3_2005.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo.

Image:Burgos Flag.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Burgos Flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Esprit15d 20:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:JamesIhaLetItComeDown.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:JamesIhaLetItComeDown.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:The Complete Calvin and Hobbes.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The Complete Calvin and Hobbes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

la galeria de banderas

jajaja ese fondo gris si saba a culo jajajaja -N 18:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Indig-film.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Indig-film.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rapomon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 693 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Enrique Bunbury - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done. --rapomon (talk) 10:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Flash Video do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 15:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I undo my changes, modyfing external link to flowplayer article. --rapomon (talk) 15:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Campo Grande (Valladolid), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ha and Pillars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rapomon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PalauDeAlmudainaMallorca.jpg

The file File:PalauDeAlmudainaMallorca.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality, superseded by files at c:Category:Exterior of the Royal Palace of La Almudaina.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]