Jump to content

User talk:Raoulduke47/Template03

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi there,

Instead of the lines of x's, you could use ----, which makes a line accross, like this:


You might find some useful tips on my desk. They are mostly links and stuff I compiled when I started editing. Another really helpful thing is the navigation popups. Follow the instructions on that page to install them. If you want to revert vandalism faster, add this:

// Admin-like RC Patrol tools

document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' 
             + 'http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:VoA/monobook.js' 
             + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>');

//[[Category:Wikipedians who use RC script ]]

to your monobook.js page. Don't forget to reload the page while pressing shift when you're done, for the changes to work. Take care, IronChris | (talk) 03:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like the "clssical" version. Since this template is more compact, I think it makes sense to include all armoured cars (we moved some to Template:WWIIBritishAFVs2, to save space) and to remove the "other armoured cars" link. Bukvoed 17:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some minor points: 1) "Level 2" headers in "tanks" and "armoured cars" sections have different colors. 2) There is a second link to "unarmoured vehicles" in the "armoured cars" section. Bukvoed 17:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


OK done that. Thanks for the advice. Can it be considered ready now? Raoulduke47 22:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the template is ready. But it might be good idea to ask for more opinions here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Weaponry task force. And thank you for your effort. Bukvoed 08:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Started a thread here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Military_history/Weaponry task force#A new navigation template for British and Commonwealth armoured fighting vehicles of World War II. Bukvoed 17:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Raoulduke47 17:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]