User talk:Raoul DMR

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Raoul DMR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 11:20, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

previously anonymous?

Hi there, Raoul DMR. Were you previously editing anonymously from Iskon dialup IPs?

For example:

I don't mean this in any demeaning way - quite the contrary - I wish to thank you for a long list of good articles :)

We could also probably ask the site administration to assign those old edits to you now that you got a username, that way your entire edit history would appear on your list. It's really great. --Joy [shallot] 10:41, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great work

I've seen a couple of your articles and they are all excellent... When I first saw Plitvice Bloody Easter, I thought it had a 10 feet long history, because articles with such completeness and neutrality cannot just come out of the blue, especially not on such a subject. What can I say? I can only hope that you don't become lazy... :) GregorB 00:21, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

Zagreb Crisis

Special:Whatlinkshere/Zagreb Crisis lists nine referrals now, so it would be great if you filled that in :) --Joy [shallot] 13:01, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Medieval Borders

Was the Cetina-Una border of Croats and Serbs in the early Medieval Ages? HolyRomanEmperor 16:09, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

According to some sources, yes. However, this should be taken with a huge rock of salt. Words like "Croats" and "Serbs" had in those periods completely different meaning than they have in more modern times. --Raoul DMR 12:09, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Partisans

By the way, I just want to remind you that you said you were taking out the part about the atrocities because you are going to reinsert them in a new section. You've been very productive so maybe with all the work you forgot. I didn't want to go ahead and do it because I wasn't sure what you had in mind, but it definitely deserves mention in the article. - Adam Mathias 01:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement Belgrade

You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 21:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, --serbiana - talk 02:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Big_Brother_(Croatia)

Your article Big_Brother_(Croatia) has been proposed for deletion "Wikipedia:No_original_research & does NOT include Wikipedia:Reliable_sources for WP:Verifiability of content." Please add references, or it will be deleted.--Parker007 02:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Raoul DMR! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 13 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 51 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Ivana Marić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Pamela Ramljak - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Neda Parmać - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nina Badrić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Boris Đurđević - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tomislav Jelić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Indira Vladić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tin Samardžić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Saša Lozar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Natalie Dizdar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Rafael Dropulić 12. Žanamari Lalić 13. Vicenco Blagaić

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rafael Dropulić

The article Rafael Dropulić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable enough, borderline CSD A7

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saša Lozar

The article Saša Lozar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable enough, borderline CSD A7

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tin Samardžić

The article Tin Samardžić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable enough, borderline CSD A7

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Damir Kedžo

The article Damir Kedžo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable enough, borderline CSD A7

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Saša Lozar and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Saša Lozar, Tin Samardžić, Damir Kedžo. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saša Lozar for Saša Lozar, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tin Samardžić for Tin Samardžić, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damir Kedžo for Damir Kedžo. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nera Stipičević

The article Nera Stipičević has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

borderline WP:CSD#A7, borderline WP:MUSIC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to report that this became easily salvageable :) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 00:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Indira Vladić

The article Indira Vladić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable local celeb covered by Colonia (music group)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ivana Marić

The article Ivana Marić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:19, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vicenco Blagaić

The article Vicenco Blagaić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable per WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bore Lee

The article Bore Lee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable - two minor hits on IMDB and nothing else. The one reference provided is a small newspaper article from his home turf.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mark^Dask 11:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]