User talk:Ransu601

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Ransu601 (talk) 05:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Tradition_(film) Above page I created with the name of "Tradition(2016)". But they remover it and rename my article as "Tradition(film)". But it is not correct because it is a short film. It is not a film. How can I rename my article?

You can find directions on how to move a page here, but I would recommend talking to the user who moved it first. --Terra ^(talk) 05:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Tradition (film)

A tag has been placed on Talk:Tradition (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tradition (2016) Short film

A tag has been placed on Tradition (2016) Short film requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tradition (film)

The article Tradition (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Lots of festival submissions, but none of them are particularily notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the alert. I updated the article. Please chack, and if the problem is sloved please remove the deletion alert.

Also, let me know your comments for future improvements. Thanks. Ransu601 (talk) 03:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and hello@Donaldd23

I deproDed the page. Some sources have been presented. I have no time to improve the page myself just now but if all agree, this might at least be redirected to the director’s page. (But maybe an article is warranted, given the screenings, if coverage is sufficientl) Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]