User talk:Ransfortstraat
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teun Voeten.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Smcg8374 (talk) 07:18, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?
[edit]
|
Hello! Ransfortstraat,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! heather walls (talk) 09:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Teun Voeten
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Teun Voeten requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Ryulong (竜龙) 09:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
You were told at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teun Voeten that you should not have made the article because he does not meet our guidelines for inclusion. Your request was declined, but you went ahead and made it anyway.—Ryulong (竜龙) 09:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teun Voeten.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 11:30, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tunnel People.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221(talk|contrib) 23:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tunnel People.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! David_FLXD (Talk) 19:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 10:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
PS: When placing a talkback template on another user's page, you should put your own user name in the second half. David_FLXD (Talk) 10:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]ok, try to edit it and than we will see. just tell me when i can resubmit and if there is anything i can do before. thanks for your help. Ransfortstraat (talk) 11:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- Editing done! Take a look. If you are happy with it I will put it online. You do not need the big "Tunnel People" heading for the article, as when it is online it has that already. Regards, David_FLXD (Talk) 12:12, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
PS you do not need to resubmit, just let me know here or my talk page. David_FLXD (Talk) 16:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
David_FLXD (Talk) 18:40, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Teun Voeten
[edit]I'm very sorry - for some reason this morning all that came up when I looked at your article were the external links, not the references so I believed it was unsourced. Since that clearly isn't the case I have reversed the decline and removed the notice from your talk page. If another reviewer hasn't gotten to your article by the end of the day, I will have another look at it then. Again, my apologies. Snowysusan 13:52, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teun Voeten.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 11:25, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- Re for your message on my Talk page, the best advice I can offer is to look at Wikipedia's 'golden rule', which explains in simple terms what is needed to prove a subject is notable. Articles and books by Voeten only show he is doing his job, unfortunately. We need to see significant coverage about him, in sources that are (reliable and) independent from him. If you have any further queries, please respond here, on your Talk page. Best of luck! Sionk (talk) 11:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- The Volkskrant review of Voeten's book may be a good source to add to your article. At least it is an independent source about his book. Sionk (talk) 12:21, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Dear, thanks for suggestions, I have immediately added the article.However, if that article was a good proof of notability, isn't the same for Magnum Foundation and Dallas Observer ? Aren't those enough? What else shall I do? At any rate, thanks for your time and kindness Ransfortstraat (talk) 13:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was busy and forgot to reply to your follow-up. The Dallas Observer seems the one very good in-depth news source. The Magnum Foundation is a charity that supports photographers, not really an independent reliable news source (Voeten is participating in a discussion about something else other than him, so it doesn't tell us a great deal about him either). As per the advice above, your article needs multiple reliable sources that are independent of Voeten and talk about him in some depth. Hope that helps! Sionk (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello again. If you can re-submit your article to Articles for Creation I would be prepared to accept it. There are still large parts that are unsourced, or sourced to WP:PRIMARY sources, but there is just about enough (in my view) to prove Voeten is widely known (and of importance). Hope that helps. Sionk (talk) 12:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. I have just re-submit, tell me if there is anything I can do. Ransfortstraat (talk) 13:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sionk (talk) 14:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)