User talk:RandyS0725

PERSONAL PAGE: can I or can I not edit as my own as long as I cite that it is not canon of any sort and thus should not be taken as canonical fact?

RandyS0725 (talk) 12:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:34 Krakskul.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:34 Krakskul.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a copyrigthed pic. I drew it myself. Check the lines on the notebook paper when you look at it up close.

Image copyright problem with Image:34 Krakskul.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi RandyS0725!
We thank you for uploading Image:34 Krakskul.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 21:03, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:34 Krakskul.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:34 Krakskul.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Hi There

Per policy all images MUST have a copyright tag. Please license your artwork with one of the licenses here. Thank you. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 01:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atomy (business)

A tag has been placed on Atomy (business), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fish ^Barking? 20:54, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, actually, I'm just fine with the page being entirely deleted. It was created by me, but I did not provide that information. I actually came across the information when looking for information on the mythical fairy called an Atomy. Someone replaced that information with information on the Korean business of the same name. So, in the interest of being polite, I tried to give the business information a separate page of its own, so the page of the legendary creature would be undisturbed. But if you think it is best, then, by all means, get rid of that page. I, for one, say good riddance. Have a nice day. :) The Penultimate (talk) 21:00, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tabliope, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leontophone, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pest, Danger and Crossroad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources please

When you create an article like Tariaksuq, please tell us where you found the information. Thanks. PamD 09:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And when you add references as you did in Yawkyawk, please use the <ref> system to make footnotes to show which source provided which information, and also cite the page number etc in the reference so that if the online link to Googlebooks fails we still have a record of the source of your information. I've upgraded the Judika Illes ref as an example. If you follow the "About this book" link in the left hand column and go right to the bottom, Googlebooks displays the publisher, date, ISBN etc. Thanks. PamD 09:15, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had sources. It's just hard to keep track of them all, with how variously the name can be spelled. But if you google the various spellings of the name, under Google Books, you should find the viable references I did.

And there's a couple regular websites that I found the name under, as well. Not chat forums or anything like that. An actual page where an Inuit storyteller narrated Inuit mythology in both the native language, and in English. I think that's viable.

If you'd like, I can provide some of the links when I have more time on my hands. Cheers. :)

The Penultimate (talk) 20:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Horerczy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horerczy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horerczy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:04, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RandyS0725. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]