User talk:Randwicked

2004 archive

Post Office

Hi, I'm not sure why you have redirected Post Office to that specific post office? This should direct to the generic Post office article. - ҉ Randwicked ҉ 07:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I take your point about why an name ought to point to one article, as in 'the post office you find in any neighbourhood'. However, to the best of my knowledge, no other Postal Service, or organisation of Post Offices in the world is known as 'The Post Office', except in the UK; although technically no longer used for postal service, many people still use the name and the brand name does still refer to Post Offices.

Maybe include a disambiguation?? I have created Post Office UK as a redirect. (RM21 21:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Hey, you still about?

I was wondering if you have the original files you used to create the regional infobox... Ta bu shi da yu 14:23, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanks mate :-) I hope you don't mind, but I uploaded it as Image:SydLGAs.png. What license can I put on it? Is GFDL OK? - Ta bu shi da yu 23:21, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

List of metro systems#Oceania

This list is accreting entries (recently Perth). I strongly doubt if there are any legitimate entries here, and I am inclined to delete the section. Susvolans (pigs can fly) 09:02, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

thanks!

thanks for removing that bit of trash about Sydney being far away from Linton. i actually created an account specifically to get rid of it, as it got on my nerves, but found someone (ie: you) had beaten me to it. nice one!

Y're welcome, Anon. Randwicked 11:53, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

List of Sovereign states

Will you also cast a vote on the move to List of countries? Electionworld 07:59, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Australian metropolitan areas

Thanks for correcting the area definitions for Sydney and Melbourne in the List of metropolitan areas by population article. The numbers are from the UN World Urbanization Prospects 2003 report (projection for 2005). I have also added the land areas for the Sydney and Melbourne statistical divisions in the article. Polaron 02:14, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Ok, I laughed..."

It's even better if you read it out loud. Joyous | Talk 02:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You win. Joyous | Talk 02:17, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

reply about db-copyvio

{{nothanks}} produces:

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Foo, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing!

— FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 10:01, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Evolution discusion Reply

It is defining the process, not the theory of the process.

Yes the orginal phrase incorrectly implies that Evolution is Fact. No where in the article does it mention or imply that Evolution is a theory, as the whole POV in the Evolution article make it sound like Fact, which is incorrect. I was trying to righ this wrong, by simply showing in the first page that is indeed a theory, and should not be implied to be fact.

Gingerfield articles

Hi there,

I notice that you marked a number of Gingerfield articles as vandalism. I do not see how they qualify as vandalism at this time. Could you perhaps explain either in your edit summary or on the articles' talk pages? Stifle 11:42, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I found out. :) Stifle 11:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aetherometry

Would you please do the favor of participating substantially in the Talk page for this subject? Your latest revert came with no edit summary.Pgio 08:07, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ya...

... thanks mate :-) The original is at http://www.perverted-justice.com/opinions/?article=11 which Perverted Justice have modified! I just got an email from the administrator of official wire, hopefully they will see where the error is!

Hey, where have you been? You missed the Wikipedia Sydney meetup! - Ta bu shi da yu 13:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it was a few weekends ago. I was incredibly slack and didn't message anyone I knew... :( Keep an eye on the Wikipedia:Meetup page! Ta bu shi da yu 13:52, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nice people, some are more eccentric than others :-) I had a blast! You've got to come to the next one! - Ta bu shi da yu 14:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Yeah, got myself an account. Look at my userpage for all my geeky contributions

AnthonyJohnson (Australian politician

what's with removing space from the name? I thought I was doing things right... ? btw still working on it but if I wait too long my proxy stuffs things up. was worried I might have missed finding this guy and created a stub when a good page already exists!

Garrie 23:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney trains: Inner West line

Trains on the inner west line do not run every 15 minnnutes outside peak hours.

The inner west line is the train line that runs from Central to Liverpool. Outside of peak hours, there are only shuttle services that serve the inner stations. From Lidcombe to Liverpool there are no trains between 9:30 am and 2:30 pm.

You're thinking of the "inner west" as opposed to the "inner west line"

--Sumple 04:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Polytechnic School

Not disagreeing, but what is your source for the Paw Print?Kiwidude 06:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Australian English

Thanks for watching and reverting I chose poor words in the note, I should have said vandalism as it had nothing to do with the article Gnangarra 03:42, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Meetup - Sunday 5th Feb 2006

Hi,

We're planning a Wikipedia meetup in Sydney, on this Sunday, the 5th February. 
This follows on from the successful first Sydney meetup in November of 2005.
We are planning on meeting at either Darling Harbour, or the Town Hall steps.
As someone listed at 
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sydney#Participants
you are of course invited, so please come along. For more details please see:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney

Please direct any comments and questions to that wiki page.

Quick note: You may wish to add:
[[Category:Wikipedians in Sydney|{{subst:PAGENAME}}]]
to your homepage, assuming that you are in Sydney. If you're not,
my apologies for the email, and thank you nevertheless for helping with the 
Sydney WikiProject!

All the best,
Nick.

Semi-automated template substitution

This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Rory0 96 02:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Ranked First!

Hi. Your thoughts on the great "ranked first" vs. "tied for first" debate on Talk:Melbourne would be much appreciated. I was glad to see your comments on User talk:Xtra, because I was starting to think "maybe it's just me, maybe they are the same thing...". Skeezix1000 03:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Date links

Since you have previously taken an interest in links. Please be kind enough to vote for my new bot application to reduce overlinking of dates where they are not part of date preferences. Thanks. bobblewik 20:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What

Why are you people dicking with my talk page? - Randwicked Alex B 06:25, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seidler

Wasn't quite sure from the initial reports that he died today hence the missing date. Good riddance I say. The edit recording his passing was the most satisfying I have made to Wp. I can't wait till they bury him and I can go have a long piss. Albatross2147 02:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another date links proposal

Sorry to disturb you again but there is another date link proposal. This time at: Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#linking_of_dates. Please feel free to support or oppose it. Thanks. bobblewik 19:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peak oil page

Why did you revert the part about the logistic curve and the hubbert curve? the logistic curve is obviously not the rate at which oil is extracted because that would imply that the amount of oil is infinite. And they say the rate of extraxtion is both a logistic curve and the hubbert curve - but those curves are different. See http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hubbert_curve

Your edits stated that the cumulative oil extraction resembled a bell curve. This is logically impossible. (P.S., you can sign your name with four tildes at the end of your message.) - Randwicked Alex B 15:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No it didn't. It said cumulative oil extracted followed a logistic curve. Rate of extraction is the derivative of that logistic curve, which is a bell shaped curve. Logistic curve is not bell shaped, the hubbert curve is. Logistic curve is not the hubbert curve.

134.53.168.97 00:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC)Doug[reply]

Suburbs statistics

If I were to make a script to extract relevant statistics from the chunky ABS census data, what should it include? jnothman ^talk 09:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'm in the middle of downloading 2024 excel spreadsheets. For some reason there's no suburb data for Qld or ACT...? But what there is, I might as well do the whole lot in one go. Let's list the sheets and the data we want to extract:

B01 - Population, area, pop density. So is ATSI percentage.
B03 - top (two?) age brackets
B05 - is this where you wanted me to extract most common nationalities from? ancestry based on parent? I'm a little confused about how to understand these tables: just use the last column? When I calculate percentages, does it include "not stated"? Does "most common" mean top 5, or all those above a certain percentage?
B06 - or did you want me to extract nationalities from here?
B07 - or is this where I should take nationality from??
B10 - get the top few religions- top by perccentage, or top 4? Count Christianity as one group or as individual sects, or both?
B18 - dwelling structure? percentage totals?
B22 - unemployment rate
B23 - non-school qualifications? percentages?
B33 - median weekly household income? median weekly individual income? mean household size?

If you could let me know what you think of the need for each of these statistics, and in complex situations how they should be calculated, that would be fantastic. jnothman ^talk 00:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Woollen-Gong

Take another look at the article.

--Amandajm 13:15, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reads better now. - ҉҉ Randwicked ҉҉ 06:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Randwicked! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Meic Stevens - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Portal of Evil for deletion

The article Portal of Evil is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portal of Evil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:50, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:OverlordQ/Portal of Evil

User:OverlordQ/Portal of Evil, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:OverlordQ/Portal of Evil and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:OverlordQ/Portal of Evil during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:24, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney meetup

Hi, I got your name from this list, and thought you might be interested in a meetup in Sydney at the Alexandria Hotel tomorrow. I hope you can join us. Sorry for the late notice. --99of9 (talk) 10:51, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil

User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 03:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jerusalem into List of national capitals by latitude. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 22:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How do you define what is the metropolitan area of a Capital City in Australia?

Hi There, just trying to understand this. The GCSSA seems to focus more on the economic and labour market aspects. Within it are other "cities" or metropolitan areas (Central Coast). Are the Urban Centre and Localities dataset from the ABS the primary method of defining the city's actual urban extent and is used to define the metropolitan area ?

And for that method how are the Significant Urban Area's used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdinesh2222 (talk • contribs) 01:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proof on those fanfiction routes

Hi Randwicked

Sorry to bother you but when you removed the "Unofficial Routes" on the NSW Road Routes page, was State Route 266 even a route or was the editor who edited that put that as a meme? was and even I went to Corowa to check it out and it's not an error. But I can't see where 266 is, I've even been to Albion Park and saw no signs of it. Was there just a former sign or someone (Thegwh32 who is blocked) who tried to trick us?

RealLifeLorefan80 (talk) 01:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: This is mainly due to the fact that I am creating an article on that as it doesn't make sense to me, hence why I want to knwo.

RealLifeLorefan80 (talk) 06:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aboriginal placenames style guidelines debate

Hi there, there is a discussion raging at the moment that will hopefully lead to a formal end to the debate and edit warring around inclusion of Aboriginal placenames in articles. I have greatly appreciated your input before on this issue and if you have the energy it'd be great to have your contribution. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians%27_notice_board#Indigenous_names — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poketama (talk • contribs) 12:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is another comment in which you attack me or atacks my opinion. You practically do nothing else in the discussion [1][2]. These are Wikipedia:Personal attacks and Wikipedia:Harassment. Please stop commenting on my comments, whatever I write - you attack it. Your opinion to my opinion is already known, please do not reply to my comments. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 06:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gadi and Sydney

Hello Randwicked.

I hope you don’t mind if I continue our discussion here, as I would like to more fully explain my position. My intention isn’t to remove Indigenous place names from articles, but to add them whenever they are well attested in the most reliable sources and unlikely to be successfully challenged. I started working on the Sydney article because I followed a link to it and saw that the entire article needs to be improved in a lot of areas. We disagree over whether the current statement that Gadi is the Dharug word for Sydney is reliably sourced. Fair enough. But another issue is that there are many highly reliable sources which show that other clans in the Sydney area had other names for their territories and none of them fully equate to Sydney, however defined. There is no doubt that the original settlement was on a part of Gadigal land, but Gadigal territory was larger than the initial settlement and their word for that territory existed for thousands of years before Sydney, for over 230 years since Sydney has existed, and will probably continue after Sydney sinks under the rising sea. I don’t think it should be reduced to a mere name for Sydney. The Sydney metropolis now covers the land of about 29 clans. Only including the Gadigal word in the lead might be seen as presumptuous. My intention is to move the word Cadi from the lead and place it in an expanded section on the First Inhabitants of the Region in order to give a summary of the clans of Sydney, their known territories, and their names for these territories. This is in line with [[WP:OTHERNAMES]] which states. “If there are three or more alternative names – including alternative spellings, longer or shorter forms, historic names, and significant names in other languages – or there is something notable about the names themselves, a separate name section is recommended.” If you are interested, I can work on a draft of my proposed new section and copy it to your for your comment. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 03:24, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed, I'd be grateful if you had the time to look over my draft of the changes to the Sydney article. I've added a section of the name for Sydney and have expanded the section on First Inhabitants of the Region to give more information on the known clans and their territories. Off course, this isn't a complete descripion of the first inhabitants, but I think it's better than what we currently have and it can be improved over time. Any comments you might have would be very welcome. (Please let me know if the link doesn't work, my technical competence is in the bottom decile.) User:Aemilius Adolphin/Sandbox2#History Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sydney LGAs test.png

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, File:Sydney LGAs test.png, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 16:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]