User talk:RandomishLodestone

Welcome!

Hello, RandomishLodestone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gospel of Josephus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Theopolisme _TALK 21:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gospel of Josephus

A tag has been placed on Gospel of Josephus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Appears to be a {{db-g3}} hoax, as there are no mentions online or otherwise.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Theopolisme _TALK 21:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gospel According to Seneca

The article Gospel According to Seneca has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication or evidence of notability. All references provided are from a website that consists of the text of the play.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 00:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Randomish, I have a feeling that this article will be deleted, so I just wanted to drop a note here that might help you out with future articles. The basic guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia are outlined at WP:NOTABILITY, and, since the "Gospel According to Seneca" would technically be a work of fiction, it would also be judged according to WP:NBOOK. I noticed that you added a link to a website that mentions the Nazarenus website. This wouldn't constitute significant coverage in reliable third-party sources; you might want to have a look at WP:RS.

As for the article itself, you might note that there is no work known as the "Gospel According to Seneca", that's simply the title of the first linked chapter of the "book" at the website. As you mention in the article, that work claims that Seneca wrote a play called Nazarenus of which there are no remaining fragments, which the chapters (called "Acts") attempt to argue for and reconstruct. So the article should either be called Nazarenus or Nazarenus: a contribution to the reconstruction of Seneca’s lost play after the title of the "book" on the "play". (But it's actually just utter WP:FRINGE nonsense that doesn't really warrant an entry anyway.) Though I think this article should be deleted, I love these modern literary hoaxes dealing with classical texts. My favorite is the Morazla "Scrolls", which claim to be a translation of new portions of the Satyricon. That book is hilarious and all done for fun, but you might also want to check out Constantine Simonides if these hoaxes interest you. All best, ^davidiad _.: 15:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gospel According to Seneca for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gospel According to Seneca is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. --Rbreen (talk) 14:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RandomishLodestone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]