User talk:Randomdudewithinternet
Hello, Randomdudewithinternet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
Thanks
[edit]I'll be making long edits on tech related articles and short grammar corrections on anything that I'm not familiar with.
Randomdudewithinternet (talk) 07:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
It's
[edit]I goofed. I read the sentence as "A satellite image of Taiwan, showing its mostly mountainous east ...", but your sentence was "A satellite image of Taiwan, showing it's mostly mountainous in the east ..." Regardless, avoid contractions (e.g. don't, can't, it's) in your writing; they are not used on Wikipedia and generally avoided in academic/formal writing. All the best, CentreLeftRight ✉ 20:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm new. Anyways I feel like the economy section of the Taiwan article is too vague. I've added a section on TSMC but there must be more on the high tech exports of taiwan, like Foxconn, UMC, TSMC, etc. Randomdudewithinternet (talk) 21:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- I forgot to sign lol Randomdudewithinternet (talk) 21:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Dates
[edit]Just a quick note: Do not write dates the same way you would say them (MOS:DATE for more details). Use whatever format the article already uses (either mdy or dmy, e.g. May 25, 2022, or 25 May 2022). All the best, CentreLeftRight ✉ 01:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Cool thank you. Randomdudewithinternet (talk) 02:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Also btw i was editing on my school ipad during school so.... Randomdudewithinternet (talk) 02:09, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Avoid using curly punctuation (e.g. curly apostrophe: ’ vs. non-curly apostrophe: '); the curly forms of punctuation may be the default for some devices.
- Use "a" instead of "an" if a word starts with a vowel but the first syllable is pronounced with a "y", such as "unitary" and "Europe".
All the best, CentreLeftRight ✉ 01:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- Imma blame autocorrect... Good day Randomdudewithinternet (talk) 01:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit]Your recent editing history at Discord shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- ferret (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bro literally I messed up I know that Randomdudewithinternet (talk) 19:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
New merge/notability discussion at Brian Thompson (businessman)
[edit]Hello there! I noticed you recently participated in a discussion of a requested move for the article Brian Thompson (businessman). That discussion was closed without an ultimate consensus decision for procedural reasons. There is a new discussion open on the article talk page, and all participants in the prior move discussion are encouraged to participate. Thank you! FlipandFlopped ツ 22:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)