User talk:RandomJoe123

Thank you for telling me where you got your source. There is wikipedia policy here saying that bulletin board posts (forum posts) are not to be used as sources. I won't delete the transfer option section but I marked it's questionable source and dont be surprised if someone else decides to remove it. I hope to not have bad relations with you and hope you like wikipedia. Oh and I probably shouldn't have reverted those stages you added but some of them didn't look like game stages such as husbands and wives and the eunuch rebellion? I can't really see how those would be game stages. Da Big Bozz 22:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Dynasty Warrior pages

It is Wikipedia policy that all material must be attributable to a reliable published source; see WP:ATT for further info. If you want to add this info to the articles, please attribute it to reliable sources using one of the methods outlined at WP:CQR. --Muchness 03:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I alrady gave a source for the Dynasty Warriors post, i said it has been hinted at on the official website, which it has, so please don't revert it again. thank you. RandomJoe123 11:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stating a source in an edit summary is insufficient to meet Wikipedia's attribution policies; you have to include a link to the source in the article. Please see the policies linked above for further info on how to correctly source material. --Muchness 04:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to Dynasty Warriors, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. Please review the WP:ATT policy page and WP:CITE for information on how to correctly source material. --Muchness 04:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for 3RR violations and vandalism at AIV. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru ^talk 05:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your use of sockpuppets to evade the above block, I have restarted the block and extended it to 48 hours. When a block has been imposed on you, trying to use other accounts to edit pages will only result in reversions of your contributions and longer blocks for you. Just sit out your time and edit more responsibly after the block expires. Kafziel ^Talk 16:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You'll want to participate in the following discussion: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Sockpuppetry_in_AfD

Good luck! --172.131.128.25 23:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]