User talk:Randolph3

Talk:Miley Cyrus#Removal of the pregnancy hoax information from the article (Controversies section)

Will you respond here? Flyer22 (talk) 21:59, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. You can simply read what I stated, if you have not already. I am now not as concerned about the removal. Flyer22 (talk) 04:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Jonas-brothers-seventeen-magazine.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jonas-brothers-seventeen-magazine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Haydenseventeenmagazinecover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haydenseventeenmagazinecover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 06:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Acharts.us

I don't know how you figure its not reliable, but acharts.us is acceptable for use on Wikipeda per WP:GOODCHARTS. Candyo32 (talk) 01:31, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also instead of going through pages and removing unsourced information or information not given in sources, use the ^{[citation needed]} template. Candyo32 (talk) 01:37, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I have stated before please use the ^{[citation needed]} template for unsourced content. Only delete if you are absolutely certain the given material is false. Candyo32 (talk) 01:46, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not in Wikipedia's guidelines nor in its policies. I can rightfully remove information which isn't supported by the links attached and which is not supported by any sources whatsoever, I won't go around placing these templates in everything that lacks sources and has links that don't support the so-called facts. All of the information on this site must be accurate, I am trying to increase the level of accuracy in these articles because we don't want to mislead the readers.

Well if you don't want to mislead the readers you should look the information up to see if it is correct, then if not remove it. I mean that is what the ^{[citation needed]} and ^{[citation needed]} templates were created for. For users to find citations for given statements. Candyo32 (talk) 02:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Your addition to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (talk) 22:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:On Deck

Template:On Deck has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 08:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Suite Life

Please don't edit war over this; you've made changes, they've been reverted and now, as the editor wishing to make significant changes to an article, it's up to you to justify those changes. Justification is achieved through discussion, building consensus. Bulldozing your changes into articles against opposition won't achieve that, it's only likely to get you you blocked. Following the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle is where you should be right now. --AussieLegend (talk) 05:26, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this was both an inappropriate edit and edit summary. The name of the program is The Suite Life of Zack & Cody, not The Suite Life of Zack and Cody (i.e. an ampersand is used, not the word "and"). The edit summary has nothing to do with the edit that you made. It's additionally inaccurate because there is no rule that navigation templates are for a single series. Wikipedia:Navigation templates says "a navigation template, navbox or topicbox is a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articles." Some examples that demonstrate that your claim is incorrect are {{Star Trek}}, {{Star Wars}}, {{Stargate}} and {{Law & Order franchise}}. The requirement is that the articles must be related, and that is the case with {{The Suite Life}}. As for {{On Deck}}, Wikipedia:Navigation templates says to "avoid repeating links to the same article within a template" and seven of the links in the template were to the same two articles. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:On Deck

As I indicated above, Wikipedia:Navigation templates says to "avoid repeating links to the same article within a template" so, could you please explain why you think this edit is appropriate? --AussieLegend (talk) 16:25, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Suite Life on Deck listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Suite Life on Deck. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Suite Life on Deck redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). AussieLegend (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Suite Life of Zack & Cody listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Suite Life of Zack & Cody. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Suite Life of Zack & Cody redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). AussieLegend (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]