User talk:RandNetter96/Archive
This is an archive of past discussions with User:RandNetter96. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I tried to warn you
I really did. Multiple people did. Should you ever be unblocked, when someone tells you to stop, you stop right that instant. Not in a minute. Not in an hour. You stop RIGHT NOW. --Tarage (talk) 23:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Blocked
I asked you nicely to stop. Then I asked you (rather bluntly for which I apologise) not to create any more user pages intended to harass other people. I was ignored. Consequently, and by the request of several editors on the ANI thread, you are now blocked indefinitely. If you wish to appeal this block, please read the guide to appealing unblocks and follow the instructions therein. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- ...Are you really still refusing to listen? Log out, go do something else, come back tomorrow with a clearer head. This is NOT going to get you unblocked. You seriously need to apologize for what you've done. --Tarage (talk) 23:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- How do I apologize? RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 23:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Come back tomorrow and read guide to appealing unblocks. Read it slowly, absorb everything being said there, and craft an unblock request that shows you know exactly what you did wrong and how you are going to make sure you don't do it again. But the first step is to walk away and come back tomorrow. --Tarage (talk) 23:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- How do I apologize? RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 23:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Unblock Request
RandNetter96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked yesterday for creating inappropriate pages to attack another editor who I was in a disagreement with. I was very heated at his apparent refusal to discuss on the talk page of the article, but I also did not edit there. I harassed him in order to make him stop and I understand that doing that is not a way to stop a dispute. I ask that this page be deleted to reflect this. I will not go after editors again, not put templates onto or otherwise edit user pages after being asked not to by an uninvolved editor. I would also like somebody to give me advice when I am in a dispute. Thank you for looking at my appeal. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 15:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Unblocking per discussion below. 331dot (talk) 16:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- I have deleted that page, as requested, and I'll leave your unblock request for someone else to review. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Just FYI there are proper channels for dispute resolution, located at WP:DR, which are available if discussion on a talk page fails to resolve an issue. Ritchie333, I would like to know what you want to see in order for an unblock here. 331dot (talk) 16:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- If you think RandNetter96 should be unblocked, and understands the problems, just do it. "I think I would also like somebody to give me advice when I am in a dispute" is a good start. I'll also remind him that if he goes anywhere near those maths articles again, he can expect to be reblocked - by his own admission he doesn't understand the subject (which is fine, we can't be experts in everything) so he shouldn't be starting arguments on it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- RandNetter96, if you agree to heed Ritchie333's advice, and agree that you will be blocked again should the same problems recur, I would be willing to unblock you. 331dot (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for giving me a second chance. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 16:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- So, to be clear, you agree? 331dot (talk) 16:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for giving me a second chance. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 16:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- RandNetter96, if you agree to heed Ritchie333's advice, and agree that you will be blocked again should the same problems recur, I would be willing to unblock you. 331dot (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- If you think RandNetter96 should be unblocked, and understands the problems, just do it. "I think I would also like somebody to give me advice when I am in a dispute" is a good start. I'll also remind him that if he goes anywhere near those maths articles again, he can expect to be reblocked - by his own admission he doesn't understand the subject (which is fine, we can't be experts in everything) so he shouldn't be starting arguments on it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
@RandNetter96: We don't understand why this website has to be removed. The link we added is about audio description. Can you be more specific? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Audiodescription (talk • contribs) 17:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- I see your point, and I will revert it. I thought that you were the ones with the domain. Sorry about that! RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 18:30, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Some tools that may be helpful
Based on the conversation on ANI, here are some tools that may be helpful for you:
- The Wikipedia Adventure tutorial
- A regular tutorial or
- A page about writing better articles.
You should absolutely take a look at WP:BRD about how to peacefully engage in dialogue when you have a dispute about an edit. By the way, the steps don't have to go in that order. If you see something that you question, you can start a discussion immediately.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
User categories
Please note that categories are not to be used for your own categorization based solely on yourself. User categories are to be used to increase collaboration around the project and are not for individuals. See WP:USERCAT. As a result I will be removing the categories you created again. Canterbury Tail talk 16:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, I did not know that was not allowed. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 16:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- No worries. Not easy to know all the ins and outs. Canterbury Tail talk 16:57, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, I did not know that was not allowed. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 16:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
1904 Olympics (Moved)
The 1904 Olympics happened 104 years ago. It's 2018. It's not "strange" to note that some facilities are still in use. It is strange to note, in 2018, that they were in use as of 2010, an arbitrary point in existence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.229.174.121 (talk) 03:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- You inserted this into it "this moment, right now, as you read this.". That is in violation of the Manual of Style 03:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Recent edits
As was discussed on my talk page, I would strongly suggest you confine your editing to articles and not issue warnings to other editors(or even seek out improper edits). I think you have good intentions but you have scared away at least one editor; once they are gone, they are hard to get back, even if you correct what you did. 331dot (talk) 08:07, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of RandNetter96ArticleSpaceTestingPleaseDelete
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, RandNetter96ArticleSpaceTestingPleaseDelete, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kleuske (talk) 16:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation at National Register of Historic Places listings in Brown County, Wisconsin
Your addition to National Register of Historic Places listings in Brown County, Wisconsin has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
WP:COPYVIO cut & pasted from https://www.wispolitics.com/2018/wisconsin-historical-society-the-albert-and-ellen-neufeld-house-listed-in-national-register-of-historic-places/ 32.218.34.48 (talk) 23:16, 13 July 2018 (UTC)