User talk:Ramwasp

Welcome!

Hello, Ramwasp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dissident Republican Attacks, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ninety:one (reply on my talk) 18:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dissident Republican Attacks

The article Dissident Republican Attacks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

totally unsourced; content duplicated from articles, list a duplication of properly sourced timeline articles and heavily biased towards recent events

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 18:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please include verifiable references from reliable sources in edits such as the one you made to Police Service of Northern Ireland. Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ 18:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Dissident Republican Attacks has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 18:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where did all those references on Dissident Republican Attacks come from? Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ 18:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Dissident Republican Attacks

I have nominated Dissident Republican Attacks, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissident Republican Attacks. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Jeff G. ツ 22:18, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Dissident Republican Attacks

A tag has been placed on Dissident Republican Attacks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 21:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Attacks attributed to Irish dissident republicans

A tag has been placed on Attacks attributed to Irish dissident republicans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 21:46, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Attacks attributed to Irish dissident republicans, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 22:38, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Dissident Republican Attacks. Favonian (talk) 22:50, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sockpuppetry, cmp. NS1609 (talk · contribs). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 23:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]