User talk:Rampfan4747

Meef

June 2015

Hello, I'm Weegeerunner. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Weegeerunner (talk) 16:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sedum acre without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Plantsurfer 16:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aechmea geminiflora. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Plantsurfer 16:22, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Seneca Caverns (Ohio), you may be blocked from editing. Plantsurfer 16:23, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sedum acre. Plantsurfer 16:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]