User talk:Rameshkru7

September 2013

Hello, I'm LogX. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Pandianadu because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- L o g X 17:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ashna Zaveri

Hello, Rameshkru7. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ashna Zaveri, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Ashna Zaveri to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 19:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ashna Zaveri

Hello, Rameshkru7,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ashna Zaveri should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashna Zaveri .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 19:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Free images

Hi Rameshkru7, the image you uploaded for Ashna Zaveri doesn't contain a free license. It's copyrighted. Only images with free license are allowed to be uploaded. You need to show evidence that the image is free to use, by a statement of the owner --ThaThinThaKiThaTha (talk) 19:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Demonte Colony

Hello Rameshkru7,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Demonte Colony for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. pcfan500 (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 08:07, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SUN EYE 1 08:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added content based on source only and I didn't make fake content. Puthuyugam is a tv channel which made the survey and it is reliable too. Wikipedia also has a page for that channel https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puthuyugam_TV. That's why I added that info. It seems like Wikipedia editor itself work for a party and it's shame. It's useless to contribute in Wikipedia anymore. If u want to block my account, go ahead and do. Rameshkru7 (talk) 12:10, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Nitesh003. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2024 Men's Asian Champions Trophy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nitesh TALK 05:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]