User talk:Ramel.levin

ARX (Algorithmic Research)

Hi. Do you have a connection with ARX (Algorithmic Research)? --Tagishsimon (talk)

Yes, I work @ ARX.

Why did you remove my edits from Electronic Signatures

Can you please explain why you've removed my addtions on the drawbacks of electornic sigantures and the how to choose guide? Ramel.levin 12:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because it looks like it's an advertisement for something, and was probably copied directly from somewhere, and is totally uncited. Also, wikipedia is not a guide or walkthrough. Also... please login when making edits, don't edit under an IP and then talk from an account -- though it was probably accidental. Gscshoyru 12:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I copied it from my own site (arx.com) and since I didn't want to link to us as a vendor, I didn't cite the source. I wrote the original text ;) I thought this would be useful, but I see your point and left it. I did roll back to adding the drawbacks of electronic signatures which does seem appropriate. Let me know if you think otherwise. Ramel.levin 07:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to say it... but I really don't think it is. It's still written in an uncyclopedic tone, still slightly POV'd, still uncited... plus, since you work for this company, it's a WP:COI so be careful. Change it so it isn't a direct copy, cite it, and make it more encyclopedic, and it should be good. Gscshoyru 15:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, I removed the section from Digital signature for the same kind of reasons. Also, that stuff is not really on-topic anyway, the article is about what digital signatures are, their history and significance. There is no place for that kind of material on Wikipedia, really, but you might consider Wikibooks. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for more on defining the purpose of Wikipedia pages, and Wikipedia:Five pillars for a good general introduction. Mango juice^talk 13:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ARX Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ARX Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

COI

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. [1] --Ronz (talk) 17:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third warning: Conflict of Interest and Spam

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Electronic signature. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Gerry Ashton (talk) 18:18, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please note that when spam links to a company are added repeatedly, that company may be blacklisted which will prevent any links to that company anywhere in Wikipedia, even by an editor who is not affiliated with the company. When such blacklisting comes to the attention of the company's management, it is conceivable the editor/employee who caused the blacklisting could face consequences from company management. --Gerry Ashton (talk) 18:24, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of ARX (Algorithmic Research)

I have nominated ARX (Algorithmic Research), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARX (Algorithmic Research). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nageh (talk) 12:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Signature API

A tag has been placed on Signature API, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nageh (talk) 18:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ARX (Algorithmic Research)

A tag has been placed on ARX (Algorithmic Research), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nageh (talk) 10:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Amikam Aharoni.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:48, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]