User talk:Rambo's Revenge/Archive 17

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rambo's Revenge. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

List of awards and honors

Hello, I noticed that you moved some "List of awards and honors..." articles back to "List of awards and nominations..." There was an effort earlier to address the limitations of "awards and nominations" by using "awards and honors" instead, and it appears that you undid these moves, citing standards. That was what we were trying to overcome, and I think we might need to formalize that. Thus, I started discussion to standardize the naming of such lists and welcome your opinion here. Erik (talk) 15:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied there, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 17:11, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Please don't take "perceived" the wrong way! My assumption was that you saw more "List of awards and nominations" more frequently than "List of awards and honors" and adjusted accordingly. Appreciate your weighing in and linking to the discussions, though! They seem to me, though, to endorse the "List of awards... received by... <entity>" structure without really touching on nominations and other kinds of recognition. What is your impression? Erik (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Community de-Adminship - finalization poll for the CDA proposal

After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.

A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;

gather opinion on the 'consensus margin' (what percentages, if any, have the most support) and

ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community. Matt Lewis (talk) 02:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Pitchfork

Thanks for your note I am basically uninterested in the other changes that AWB makes (I didn't deliberately choose those features), so if you have some objection to that, I won't challenge you there. When it comes to "pitchfork", I simply do not think that it is well-known enough to merit being referred to by such a generic name. Presently, [[Pitchfork Media]]s outnumber [[Pitchfork Media|Pitchfork]]s by a ratio of something like 5:1, so this is really just being consistent with how their name is already used throughout the encyclopedia. If you want to respond, please do so on my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Chris Brown (American singer)#Title of article

Hello, Rambo's Revenge. Would you mind commenting on the above linked topic, since it is about two recent article moves you made? Flyer22 (talk) 01:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

In the words of Mr Boombastic: "It Wasn't Me". Rambo's Revenge (talk) 13:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Laughing out loud!!!! I remember that song. Yeah, I explained my mistake on the Chris Brown article talk page. Again, sorry about pointing to the wrong person. Flyer22 (talk) 01:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

ಠ_ಠ listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ಠ_ಠ. Since you had some involvement with the ಠ_ಠ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Zondor (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)