Jump to content

User talk:RamTripathi33

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Brian R Hunter. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cow urine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. These extreme claims need full citations. They are clearly psuedo-religious beliefs and not science Brian R Hunter (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added citations from sxientific research of a government website. Why are u undoing my contributions. Why people hate Hindus. RamTripathi33 (talk) 18:17, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The citations were from. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566776/ RamTripathi33 (talk) 18:18, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your non-scientific, religious based beliefs need to be added as such and not presented as facts Indian scientists have called for this 'research' to be defunded https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/indian-scientists-decry-infuriating-scheme-study-benefits-cow-dung-urine-and-milk Brian R Hunter (talk) 18:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No i am not talking about BJP government funded research but the one by US government https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566776/.

Have u heard of NCBI ever. Republish my edit after going through the article. RamTripathi33 (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this website it is tge one funded by US government

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/National_Center_for_Biotechnology_Information

RamTripathi33 (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BTW you are using a science magazine as your sole information source and not a trusted givernment research firm like me. RamTripathi33 (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will u please republish the my edits Mr. Administrator RamTripathi33 (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have'nt u read the research paper till now RamTripathi33 (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your quoted article is a link to research by "The Journal of Complementary Medicine Research" (formely Know as Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology) is aimed to serve an intercultural contemporary approach to the knowledge about world-wide usage of complementary medicine and their empirical and evidence-based effects.

This is not peer-reviewed science and not US government funded either. Brian R Hunter (talk) 18:36, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What about this research paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3530343/ By medknow publications on NCBI RamTripathi33 (talk) 18:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is sourced from https://www.ancientscienceoflife.org another un-scientific not-peer reviewed journal. The NBCI resource you are using is just a link to articles published anywhere, it does not give the articles any validation. Brian R Hunter (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hinduism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JRDkg (talk) 12:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for letting me know about Anti hindu encyclopedia which never lets us publish good sides of the faith and its various liberal aspects completely despite my edits are from genuine sources so good bye wikipedia. Dont ask for donations from india as you do every year. RamTripathi33 (talk) 15:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How can Jai shree Ram is war cry https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Jai_Shri_Ram but Allahu akbar is not terrorist war cry. RamTripathi33 (talk) 18:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

[edit]

Please take notice of WP:3RR. You have reverted five times now at Hinduism. This is your only warning: next time you revert within the next 24 hours, you'll be reported for edit-warring, and be blocked. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 08:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hinduism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cow urine, you may be blocked from editing. How many times are you going to try to put this? This has already been explained to you. Meters (talk) 08:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Hinduism) for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Takbir have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 18:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, RamTripathi33, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

RamTripathi33, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]