User talk:Raja Raja Raju

Pulipati Gonki Naidu

Could you please finish this? Otherwise it risks deletion. Boleyn (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My dear brother, I just have finished by adding reference. Raja Raja Raju (talk) 05:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Pulipati Gonki Naidu. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Please follow WP:BRD when edits are reverted. All edits at Wikipedia are subject WP:CONSENSUS. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please reach WP:CONSENSUS before reinstating disputed content. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 14:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 11:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pulipati Gonki Naidu. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:58, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Authentic Source can't be ignored

It's not good to remove such a valuable record (about Pulipati Gonki Naidu) by Kotha Bhavaiah, based on ancient historical evidences such as stone inscriptions, copper plates and scripts within the knowledge of kings and chiefs of that contemporary period. Raja Raja Raju (talk) 14:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a reliable source for history according to Wikipedia policies. Sorry. You have had two experienced editors tell you so. If you persist, I will have to call an administrator to advise you. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pulipadu

Please add references to this. It is at risk of being tagged for deletion without them, and the WP:BURDEN is on the creator. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:01, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Raja, can you please finish this, so I can review it? Until then, it can't be properly indexed by search engines, and as there are so many unreferenced sub-stubs on Indian geography causing bad feeling, someone of a more deletionist bent may just delete it. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pulipati Venkateswarlu concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pulipati Venkateswarlu, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pulipati Venkateswarlu

Hello, Raja Raja Raju. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pulipati Venkateswarlu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]