User talk:Rainbouw19

Welcome!

Hello, Rainbouw19, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Time Machine (video game), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Bethesda ^{(let's discuss)} 10:30, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Time Machine (video game)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Time Machine (video game), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bethesda ^{(let's discuss)} 10:30, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine, I'll get citation and make the title distinct next time Rainbouw19 (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI and your edits

Just because you disclose your COI on your userpage does not entitle you to disrupt this project. Your draft about Mevlüt Dinç was overly promotional, and I deleted it per WP:G11. The stub articles you created about games developed by Dinç were unsourced nothings. Generously, I moved them to draft space. Consider this your only warning. Do not create promotional pages. Do not move drafts to article space on your own. You must use WP:AFC. Finally, any future edits you make must be encyclopedic and demonstrate competence. If you fail in any of these things, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[below moved from my Talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:56, 7 August 2021 (UTC)][reply]

Hello, thanks for the warning. I understand the removal of the game articles I created, I thought they would be drafts, I intended to fill them when I realized the pages are created. About the main article I am working on, Mev is a Bafta member for his contributions to the gaming industry and of the most respected figures in gaming industry. I will be continuing to create/edit his draft page. If I don't, or if I get banned, there will be hundreds flooding in to do it anyway because his book is just out. I don't mean to.. well, I mean to ask for your guidance and request that you do not delete the DRAFT Mev Dinc. Is that OK? Is there a way I can have the deleted work back? I did not mean to publish it before getting several approvals, I was only working on an early draft and learning Wikipedia. May I go on working on it? I understand the other page deletions, sorry, I did not think they would just get published without a draft stage. I am new here.

Okay, I restored the Dinc draft for you. Pay attention to the editors who review the draft; they are far more experienced than you. A couple of procedural things. It's usually a good idea to keep Talk page conversations in one place, which is why I moved your comments from my Talk page to here. Also, please learn to WP:SIGN your posts in discussions.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, got it. I will prep more and continue. I figured the columns and the tildes, thanks. Rainbouw19 (talk) 13:26, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bbb23, I posted the current draft for review.Rainbouw19 (talk) 17:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mev Dinc

To me, the draft Draft:Mev Dinc looks OK. However, I am not the one who reviewed the draft when it was last submitted, so I can't say whether it will be published or not. But I think it can be submitted for review again anyway. JIP | Talk 18:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jon Dean

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jon Dean requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ×Elvorix^talk 19:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made a lousy start. Sorry. I will finish off Mev first, then go about a proper page for Jon Dean.

File:Mev dinc.jpg

I notice you've uploaded File:Mev dinc.jpg to Commons saying that the photo is your "own work". Just to check the rights there: is this correct, that you took the photo yourself, or otherwise hold the rights to it? Or are you reusing a photo from elsewhere on the internet? That can be okay, but it'll need explicit permission from the copyright holder. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my own work (Sorry I was new to Wikipedia, and just about a month old now , will read more about photo citing now). But after reading his book I contacted him and have is consent to work on wiki page, photos & media. This is one of the photos taken by his friends on a phone and forwarded to him. To be honest, the quality is bad and I have found much better candidates. Would it be fine to keep this for a while, and I'll try get a better referenced and good quality picture of him? Rainbouw19 (talk) 06:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll flag it on Commons as lacking permission, which will give you appropriate guidance for how to confirm that permission and a deadline of a week to provide that. (If it takes longer, you can just reupload when you've got permission.) It does need Mev to say that he's fine with that image being put out under a CC-Attribution licence, and that the friend who took the photo wouldn't object to this, which he may not have explicitly said when approving your working on his wiki biography. --Lord Belbury (talk) 11:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lord Belbury, I have met Mev personally today and taken a new picture, I just uploaded it and mentioned "This picture was taken by me, today, I met Mev and he granted permission to use this photo on Wikipedia. I would appreciate help for choosing what copyright category it would fall into." Here is the link [1]. Does it look right? . I will try delete the old file. Rainbouw19 (talk) 13:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mev Dinc has been accepted

Mev Dinc, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

IceWelder [✉] 16:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Prodigy (1986 video game)

Hello, Rainbouw19. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prodigy (1986 video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heroes Chained - Elf.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heroes Chained - Elf.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]