User talk:Rainad
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Teahouse Invitation
[edit]Hello! Rainad,
you're invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse – an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
|
August 2012
[edit]Hello, I'm TYelliot. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Energy Charter Treaty, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 12:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Energy Charter Treaty
[edit]Hi, Rainard. You have made several edits concerning the infobox in the Energy Charter Treaty article; however, you did not provide any explanation why you would like to change the standrd size of the infobox. Also, the |capture=
parameter is not meant to title the map. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 12:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- I prefer the discussion to be in one place, so if you not against, you may answer here. Concerning larger map, in this case I propose to move it back to the relevant section out of the infobox. I would also like to say that MOS:FLAG is discouraging usage of flag icons in infoboxes. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 13:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Concerning flags - While that may be true, that the MOS:FLAG is discouraging the use of flag icons in the infoboxes it is vital to understand that the origin and nationality of its highest staff is necessary to portray. Such approaches can be seen in other multilateral organizations such as International Energy Agency and World Trade Organization. Concerning the map change -> when you standardized it was uselessly small. Do you have any reasons are arguments to move the Map to the Membership area? I'd prefer it in the Infobox as it is immediately clear to the reader what kind of organization the article is about.
- I have different opinion concerning flag icons; however, I will not argue about this. Concerning infobox, changing size of the map changes size of the infobox which makes it ugly and dominative in the text. Infobox should be the supporting material, not the main element of the article. I also strongly disagree that map in its standard size is uselessly small. However, in the case of need, one could allways to open the map image to see it in its full size. Beagel (talk) 13:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- I guess your argument is valid and the map should be standardized.
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 14:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for August 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Energy Charter Treaty, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Transit, Energy efficiency and Deputy Secretary General (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Energy Charter Treaty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to ICSID
- Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Slovak
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Energy Charter Treaty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Mandate, FDI, Conference and Energy efficiency
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Daniel Caverzaschi
[edit]To request deletion of Daniel Caverzaschi, you should use Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Instructions are given on that page. For new articles, a wp:speedy can be used, but this has been there too long, I believe. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 03:56, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)