Jump to content

User talk:Rain 03982

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Rain 03982, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Monywa Airport did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Screenshot 2024-07-22 at 10.51.59 PM.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:AungKaung932 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AungKaung932. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The WordsmithTalk to me 17:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rain 03982 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello,I am just an amateur editor with about a year of experience. Until now, I didn't even know the definition of a sock puppet. I can vouch for my integrity. As an aviation student, I initially became a Wikipedia editor to contribute to Myanmar's aviation-related pages, which I did as you can see from my past edits, I mainly edited about pages like Myanmar Airways International, Myanmar National Airlines, ects. Recently, I started editing Myanmar pageantry pages because I noticed there was missing or incomplete information. My goal is simply to be helpful and has nothing to do with these pageantry sock puppet things.

Decline reason:

Confirmed substantial WP:LOUTSOCK at the very least. Nor have you addressed the concerns at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AungKaung932/Archive. Yamla (talk) 14:58, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rain 03982 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I want to express my sincere confusion and concern regarding this situation. I have been accused of activities that I genuinely have no knowledge of or involvement in. As an amateur editor, my only goal has been to contribute positively to Wikipedia, particularly in areas related to Myanmar's aviation industry and, more recently, Myanmar pageantry.

I assure you that I have not engaged in any sock puppetry or any other deceptive practices. My edits have always been made in good faith, with the intention of improving the quality of information available on Wikipedia. I was unaware of the allegations until now, and I can firmly state that I have not participated in any activities that would violate Wikipedia's policies.

I kindly request that you reconsider the decision in light of this information. If there is anything I can do to clear up this misunderstanding, I am more than willing to cooperate.

Decline reason:

AI generated requests are not considered(100% certain according to GPTzero). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you. Please write in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 12:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) This is the second time you (or your AI buddy) says you are an "amateur editor" – amateur, as distinct from what? And why is that relevant? (Just trying to understand the point behind this assertion.) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]