User talk:RahulRavichandran57

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, RahulRavichandran57, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Jon Snow (character) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:19, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 20:59, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Panimalar Engineering College. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 21:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Panimalar Engineering College

Your recent editing history at Panimalar Engineering College shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 21:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What I edited was basic information from news and media. RahulRavichandran57 (talk) 21:34, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Add your reliable sources. Read Wikipedia:Common knowledge and Weasel words. There's no such thing as "basic information from news and media". Link that "basic information". I also remind you that adding unsupported claims could be libelous. —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 06:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have a article from the Hindu newspaper RahulRavichandran57 (talk) 09:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help

How many times can a person edit a single article? RahulRavichandran57 (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As many as you want. But you can't undo others' edits more than three times in a 24-hour period. Why do you ask? RunnyAmiga ※ talk 21:34, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So can you understand that my edit is valid?? RahulRavichandran57 (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't intend to violate any rules. I solemnly obey all rules imposed by Wikipedia. RahulRavichandran57 (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source? RunnyAmiga ※ talk 21:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is source? I'm new to Wikipedia. RahulRavichandran57 (talk) 21:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper articles that prove what you're saying is true. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 21:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wait. RahulRavichandran57 (talk) 21:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why I can't post the links? RahulRavichandran57 (talk) 21:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have newspaper articles now but I can't post it to you . Why? RahulRavichandran57 (talk) 21:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What newspaper? RunnyAmiga ※ talk 00:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to Wikipedia:Citing sources for information on what, and how, to cite. You can also enable ProveIt in your Preferences -> Gadgets section to make citing easier.

Please remember that it's not enough to just cite a source, it needs to be reliable. So blogs and user-generated sites aren't accepted. —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 06:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Enai Noki Paayum Thota has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Enai Noki Paayum Thota was changed by RahulRavichandran57 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871697 on 2017-01-02T19:47:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]