User talk:Rafs123
October 2020
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:39, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Rafs123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi there I can see you have removed HCL wiki updated content, I spoke to Prolix and got the direction him to update the content with news reference which I did. So wondering will you be kind to let me know why the changes have been reverted and what was the violation please. Maybe I didn’t understand the policy properly Will appreciate if you can let me know. Regarding Rafs123 and Rahulyk321 account, Wanted to clarify that I wanted to keep two accounts separate, one for any website/journal etc update which is more professional and Rafs123, I intend to use to contribute in personal space which is more to do with family and friends updates. however you can see my history of discussion with Prolix where I was actively talking to him regarding the update with references. Update from another account was intentional but due to the reason given above.. can answer or clarify if you have any question. Will appreciate if you can revert the changes if you are satisfied. Also please let me know if I need to use just one account, I am a new user so your guidance will be helpful. Rafs123 (talk) 11:15, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
But you didn't keep the accounts separate, did you? In fact, all three accounts (this one and RAHULYK321 and Rafs1234) have not edited any article other than HCL Technologies. So, a pretty clear violation there. And the content you've been adding has been in violation of WP:PROMO at least, and possibly WP:COI and WP:PAID, too. Yamla (talk) 12:26, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi Yamla, Rahulyk321 and Rafs123 are my accounts that I agree, I specified the intentions of use for these accounts as well. I am a new user hence have started with the edit of HCL page which is legitimate with proper reference at this point. These accounts are separate, maybe I didn’t understand how to keep account separate which you can point out and I’ll correct it. Also to avoid any confusion further, I will just use this account for any contribution going forward. Please suggest what else needs to be done to either unblock me or get the previous edit back as it has all the references attached. Thanks Rafs123 (talk) 12:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Rafs123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi There I have posted message above regarding my edit of HCL wiki page. I have given reason of multiple accounts as well. My intention is not to damage the information and violations as mentioned above is not true in any way, that I can confirm. My only mistake is usage of multiple account which I did to keep it separate for different purpose which I now understand that it would have been good to keep single account. I request you to ignore my multiple accounts in light of unawareness and being new user. I can confirm that I’ll be using Rafs123 account going forward for any contribution. I also wanted to let you know that my edits had right references and it all genuine update in true spirit. Please let me know the next steps pls. I’ll be careful from next time. Thanks Rafs123 (talk) 14:11, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your edits also appear to be promotional. Please address these concerns in any future unblock requests. signed, Rosguill talk 16:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rafs123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi Rosguill, I can confirm that edits are not promotional and are based on facts and analysts reports on product offering for this company. I have read (can share if needed) a few analyst report about product offering and assessments beieng made by them. Possibly in detail edit about product offerings may have given you that impression about promotion. Again as I said above, ignore my unwareness being new user like to what detail edit should have been made. I am sure others may have learnt it as well from past mistakes. Again I can assure all admins here that I will keep edits to minimal that conveys the right message and support valuable contribution. Rafs123 (talk) 19:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This block has expired. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 09:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.