Jump to content

User talk:Radon210/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8

Warning

You have chosen to acuse my of vandalism on my user page. This is a serious and unfounded accusation. Kindly bother to read the edits I made. I removed people who are non noteable by wiki standards in an effort to strengthen the article.

Any intelligent person reading my edits, and the corresponding summaries would clearly see they are good-faith edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.126.73 (talk) 01:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

My mistake and I apologize for the misunderstanding. Alexfusco5 01:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

CKOB

Hi there, I the reason why I added information and reverted it back after you changed it is because the links from the CRTC are a part of the history of the station, including additional information on the station(s). Please do not revert the CKOB page again. Thank you! :-)

My mistake, I clicked the wrong button when patrolling Wikipedia for vandalism Alexfusco5 20:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

What?

Why did you call my edits "Vandalism" when I was working on cleaning the article up? 216.221.109.156 (talk) 21:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

The edit appeared to be vandalism as it removed content without an explaination. If you feel it was not vandalism please remember to use the edit summary next time Alexfusco5 21:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 24 9 June 2008 About the Signpost

Board elections continue WikiWorld: "Triskaidekaphobia" 
News and notes: Military media mention, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Main page day Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Confirmation

Yes, I requested access to the tools. -- SamuelWantman 22:32, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 25 23 June 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Board elections completed; results forthcoming WikiWorld: "John Hodgman" 
News and notes: Military media mention, milestones Dispatches: How Wikipedia's 1.0 assessment scale has evolved 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 26 26 June 2008 About the Signpost

Ting Chen wins 2008 Board Election ArbCom's BLP "special enforcement" remedy proves controversial 
Global group discussions in progress WikiWorld: "Raining animals" 
News and notes: Foundation hires, milestones Dispatches: Reliable sources in content review processes 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 27 30 June 2008 About the Signpost

Private arbitration case criticized, vacated Other ArbCom announcements reviewed in wake of controversy 
Statistical model identifies potential RfA candidates WikiWorld: "Mike Birbiglia and the Perils of Sleepwalking" 
News and notes: Board votes released, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Sources in biology and medicine Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 28 7 July 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: Transparency 
Wikimedia releases 2008-2009 Annual Plan Defamation case against Wikimedia dismissed 
WikiWorld: "Charles Lane" News and notes: Adminbots, abuse filter, ArbCom, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, June 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:59, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: speedy deletion

I have removed the request for speedy deletino for the disambiguation page, 'Francis MacDonald' as it does exist. I set up the redirect and then immediately wrote the page, you must have seen it very quickly. Boleyn (talk) 19:17, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for removing it for me. I noticed you had created the other page and was going to revert but it was already gone. It may be a good idea in the future to create the page before the redirect. Happy editing! Alexfusco5 19:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

ACC Tool

Yes I did. The Llama! (talk) 02:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I can't find the info for this anywhere else. If a username is taken or such and I hit Taken, does it send them an E-mail? If it does not do I send them one from my personal E-mail account? The Llama! (talk) 03:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I should note that this was a grawp sock. --slakrtalk / 18:31, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
My bad, and thanks for pointing it out (this makes me feel very stupid). Alexfusco5 19:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, what proof is being used to say that Llamadog903 (talk · contribs) is a sockpuppet of Grawp? I am not seeing any link. --Elonka 20:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I suggest we start with a copy of the current Main Page, called Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal/Main Page Draft, and through edits and discussion transform it via consensus into the new Main Page that will be proposed to the community for final approval. Competitions won't work (we tried that last time), because submissions that are only slightly different from each other will divide the vote between them which will drive their basic common design out of the competition, obscuring its support as well as support for particular design elements. Each new design element or change needs to be discussed on the talk page of the community-developed draft, to arrive at a consensus for each as to whether it should be included or not, and what each design element should look like. We need to literally get on the same page and integrate the best features of all those wonderful designs that have been submitted. Let the edit wars editing and discussion begin! :) The Transhumanist    01:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 29 14 July 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: Transparency 
WikiWorld: "Goregrind" Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 30 21 July 2008 About the Signpost

WikiWorld: "Cartoon physics" News and notes: New Board Chair, compromised accounts 
Dispatches: History of the featured article process Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

RfB Thank You spam

Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! RlevseTalk 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on the successful RfB. I'm sure you'll be a great crat. Happy promoting/renaming! Alexfusco5 16:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.

Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 31 28 July 2008 About the Signpost

Wikimania 2008 wrap-up WikiWorld: "Terry Gross" 
News and notes: Unblocked in China Dispatches: Find reliable sources online 
WikiProject Report: Military history Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 32 9 August 2008 About the Signpost

Anthrax suspect reportedly edit-warred on Wikipedia WikiWorld: "Fall Out Boy" 
Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, July WikiProject Report: WikiProject New York State routes 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 33 11 August 2008 About the Signpost

Study: Wikipedia's growth may indicate unlimited potential Board of Trustees fills Nominating Committee for new members 
Greenspun illustration project moves to first phase WikiWorld: "George Stroumboulopoulos" 
News and notes: Wikipedian dies Dispatches: Reviewing free images 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 34 18 August 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: Help wanted 
WikiWorld: "Cashew" Dispatches: Choosing Today's Featured Article 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Main page redesign

Hello, Radon210! Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal was recently cleared of all design entries. You may want to re-enter your design(s), based on the details here. (You can see the old list of designs here). NOTE: A survey was conducted on what users wanted to see in the new main page, you can see the results here. NickPenguin(contribs) 01:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the info Alexfusco5 02:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 35 25 August 2008 About the Signpost

WikiWorld: "George P. Burdell" News and notes: Arbitrator resigns, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Interview with Mav 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 36 8 September 2008 About the Signpost

Wikimedia UK disbands, but may form again WikiWorld: "Helicopter parent" 
News and notes: Wikipedian dies, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Featured topics Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, August 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 37 15 September 2008 About the Signpost

Wikiquote checkuser found to be sockpuppeteer WikiWorld: "Ubbi dubbi" 
News and notes: Wikis Takes Manhattan, milestones Dispatches: Interview with Ruhrfisch, master of Peer review 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:58, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: ACC

No, I will tell you exactly what I done. Firstly I defered to admin, because I had tried creating and I was told it was too similar to an account of the same name, with no log. So, I defered to users and then hit taken. That was it. I didn't click reset. I actually thought I had finally got it right. But then I got suspended, but this time I don't know how that happen. The only time I saw the request in the closed box, was when I put it there (when I clicked Taken). Right now - very confused. Olly150 22:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll make better use of bypassing the cache Olly150 22:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Look again please. I've done nothing "unconstructive". Your warning is unmerited. 75.161.222.150 (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

My mistake I clicked revert for the wrong edit, my mistake Alexfusco5 16:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
No problemo. Thanks for the speedy response. 75.161.222.150 (talk) 16:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Straw poll

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll in selecting five proposals before an RFC in which it will be against the current main page. You're input would be appreciated. ChyranandChloe (talk) 04:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the note :) Alexfusco5 16:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Account creation

I've just denied a request, but it was actually because I'd just misclicked with my mouse and I haven't looked into the case yet. Could you undo please? It Is Me Here (talk) 15:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, I've fixed the problem. Just note from now on you can click "Reset Request" and fix it yourself ;) Alexfusco5 23:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
OK, thanks, I'd figured as much but thought it would be best if I stopped touching anything just in case. It Is Me Here (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 42 8 November 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
News and notes: The Price is Right, milestones Dispatches: Halloween Main Page contest generates new article content 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 43 10 November 2008 About the Signpost

Fundraiser opens: Over $500,000 raised in first week ArbCom elections: Nominations open 
Book review: How Wikipedia Works MediaWiki search engine improved 
Four Board resolutions, including financials, approved News and notes: Vietnamese Wiki Day 
Dispatches: Historic election proves groundbreaking on the Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 44 17 November 2008 About the Signpost

Lawsuit briefly shuts down Wikipedia.de GFDL 1.3 released, will allow Wikimedia migration to Creative Commons license 
Wikimedia Events Roundup News and notes: Fundraiser, List Summary Service, milestones 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

arbcom vote

I noticed your edit summary - was your vote in the right section? 220.240.24.119 (talk) 02:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes it was, that was a typo but thanks for your concern considering I already voted wrong on 2 of them Alexfusco5 02:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Date autoformatting

WRT to your comments at MOSNUM, you may be interested in reading this, which did the rounds some time ago:

Disadvantages of date-autoformatting


  • (1) In-house only
  • (a) It works only for registered (Wikipedian) users who have set their date preferences and are logged in.
  • (b) To our readers out there, it displays all-too-common inconsistencies in raw formatting in bright-blue underlined text, yet conceals them from WPians who are logged in and have chosen preferences.
  • (2) Avoids what are merely trivial differences
  • (a) It is trivial whether the order is day–month or month–day. It is more trivial than color/colour and realise/realize, yet our consistency-within-article policy on spelling (WP:ENGVAR) has worked very well. English-speakers readily recognise both date formats; all dates after our signatures are international, and no one objects.
  • (3) Colour-clutter: the bright-blue underlining of all dates
  • (a) It dilutes the impact of high-value links.
  • (b) It makes the text slightly harder to read.
  • (c) It doesn't improve the appearance of the page.
  • (4) Typos and misunderstood coding
  • (a) There's a disappointing error-rate in keying in the auto-function; not bracketing the year, and enclosing the whole date in one set of brackets, are examples.
  • (b) Once autoformatting is removed, mixtures of US and international formats are revealed in display mode, where they are much easier for WPians to pick up than in edit mode; so is the use of the wrong format in country-related articles.
  • (c) Many WPians don't understand date-autoformatting—in particular, how it differs from ordinary linking; often it's applied simply because it's part of the furniture.
  • (5) Edit-mode clutter
  • (a) It's more work to enter an autoformatted date, and it doesn't make the edit-mode text any easier to read for subsequent editors.
  • (6) Limited application
  • (a) It's incompatible with date ranges ("January 3–9, 1998", or "3–9 January 1998", and "February–April 2006") and slashed dates ("the night of May 21/22", or "... 21/22 May").
  • (b) By policy, we avoid date autoformatting in such places as quotations; the removal of autoformatting avoids this inconsistency.

Tony (talk) 03:49, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments, but some editors may prefer to see the date the way they want. Those who don't care and are against it can always turn the preference off. Alexfusco5 20:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
It is not about whether one wants it or not, though. There is a clear consensus at the RfCs to not link dates. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Also, IP readers (the vast majority of our readership) cannot "turn their preferences off" and are forced to see the date formatting inconsistencies. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:54, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Well as I suggested on bugzilla a non-linking date syntax with a default for IP users will likely solve the outstanding problems Alexfusco5 02:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes, if autoformatting is deemed absolutely necessary through the RfCs, then the bugzilla patch will be a welcome replacement. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Well some patch will probably be committed to mediawiki because this isn't the only site that uses it. We can still however choose not to use it Alexfusco5 02:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!


Hey, this is the user who you told not to vandalize the sandbox. I thought that you could do whatever with the sandbox was I wrong?

66.32.182.215

Well I did something wrong, my bad the sandbox is supposed to be on a whitelist and I missed the page title I apologize Alexfusco5 01:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Howdy

Big Mac. anyway, I did not vandalize the sandbox, you can edit it however you want right?

kick it pop it shove it

My fault, I expected the sandbox to not show up in my quene of possible vandalism the problem has been solved and I apologize Alexfusco5 01:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Reversion

Thanks for the vandalism reversion on my userpage! Much appreciated :) ♥NiciVampireHeart01:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Osiris-Dionysys

Last I checked, "[a]ny good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." The "Latter-Day Perspective" section on the article was ridiculously irrelevant, and I said so in the "reason for edit" space. So why do I have to make the change three different times to make it stick? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.233.83.157 (talk) 01:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

It appeared to be blind removal of content, I apologize for the error Alexfusco5 01:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Ah, no harm done. Thanks for the response anyway. 98.233.83.157 (talk) 04:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas to you!
Have a very merry Christmas, and a great new year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Regards (and Season's Greetings!) from Stwalkerstertalk ] 21:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Irrelivent Warnings

Why did you place this Sock Puppetry warning on my talk ??? It states that you put it there in 2007. I hadn't join Wikipedia then. Did you also put the other warnings on my talk ? Please write back. Jonny7003 (talk) 09:57, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I've never edited your talk unless you've had a different username in the past Alexfusco5 16:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.


The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 45 24 November 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: 200th issue 
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones 
Wikipedia in the news Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 46 1 December 2008 About the Signpost

ArbCom elections: Elections open Wikipedia in the news 
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System Features and admins 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 5, Issue 1 3 January 2009 About the Signpost

From the editor: Getting back on track 
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK 
Editing statistics show decline in participation Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting 
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments Dispatches: Featured list writers 
Wikipedia in the news WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Flagged Revs

Hi,

I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 07:08, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Done and you stole it from Neurolysis Alexfusco5 22:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: December themed Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 18:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost

Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices 
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet 
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by 03:19, 25 January 2009 (UTC) at §hepBot (Disable)

Thanks for uploading File:Dryopithecus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 5 31 January 2009 About the Signpost

Large portion of articles are orphans News and notes: Ogg support, Wikipedia Loves Art, Jimbo honored 
Wikipedia in the news: Flagged Revisions, Internet Explorer add-on Dispatches: In the news 
WikiProject Report: Motto of the Day Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 05:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

ACC tool

I would like access back to the ACC tool. For some reason I just completely forgot about it for a while. The Llama! (talk) 23:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

 Done Alexfusco5 02:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 07:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

on ACC - still reserved?

You still have this marked as being handled on ACC, but it's already closed and done with. Could you consider un-marking it to clear up the reserved requests log? Thanks, flaminglawyer 01:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Done, I was just reserving it because I needed to keep an eye on it Alexfusco5 01:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

ACC Account Suspended

Can my account be unsuspended? I promise to be more active. :p Glacier Wolf 03:11, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

 Done Alexfusco5 20:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism alert

You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact.

This is an automatically generated message. If problems occur, please contact User:nathanww. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The King's a-poopin' (talkcontribs) 12:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, Radon210/Archive 7, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Versus22 talk 04:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Alexfusco5 16:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia!

Thanks for welcoming me a way back at May 08. Its only just now that I've really had time to thank people for what they've done. Feel free to sign my guestbook! :) Ross Rhodes (T C) Sign! 20:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

No problem and I really appreciate the thank you very few people (so far only you) actually thanked me for welcoming them Alexfusco5 22:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 15:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 17:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

No flagged revisions category up for deletion

The category associated with the no flagged revisions userbox you have placed on your user page is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009 April 23#Category:Wikipedia users who oppose Flagged Revisions and you are invited to share your opinions on the issue. Alansohn (talk) 04:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated User talk:Alexfusco5/Sandbox (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many ottersOne hammerHELP) 16:11, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

You could have just deleted that, I meant to have it {{db-user}}'d a while ago Alexfusco5 23:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Account creation

I tried to log into account creation and got this message:

I'm sorry, but, your account is presently suspended. The reason given is shown below:

inactive for over 45 days

Could you please activate my account? Fred Talk 15:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

New Siggy

New sig, i'll just put it on your guestbook to replace it with my old pice o' shit one...

PS; I'm number 39

YaBoiKrakerz

You have me flagged as a suspect about something I don't know. What's with that? I have been researching in Wikipedia for a few years. Just found a glaring error in my area of my expertise, and because YOU say I abused an article about someone I've never heard of and don't care about, I can't join WIKIPEDIA and change that error?

What's with that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapman923 (talkcontribs) 03:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 10:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:20, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Help concerning Annoying User

I saw that you were an Active member of the user warning program and thought you could help me out with user: Jeffro77. He keeps editing and posting agressive comments on my page, I got tired o treating him like as an adult so I started annoying him back, I apologize I know it was wrong but he won't stop. He closely monitors my contributions to several pages specially the contributions towards a group of people called Jehova's Witnesses and always modifies or undo all my edits even though they are right. By my history you can see how I began to erase opinions (since wikipedia as a online encyclopedia looks for facts), harmful statements towards Jehova's Witness and other people that include wrong citations or no citations or references at all. Jeffro77 keeps leaving comments under my page and editing or undoing what I have rightfully deleted according to wikipedia standards and guidelines I myself have annoyed him as well but only under my page. I just want someone with some sort of authority to tell him to concentrate on editing rather on attacking or aggravating other users and their comments. Thankyou in advanceWladimir Bravo (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Wladimir Bravo

You should probably post to WP:AN about that and get help from an admin because I'm just an ordinary user and have no special authority. Alexfusco5 20:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
I specifically stated to User:Wladimir Bravo at the outset that: "it is appropriate to remove unsourced or unverifiable material", and I have not undone any of the user's edits where such information has been removed. The JW project articles are in my watchlist, so I inherently "closely monitor" edits to those pages. See the user's misrepresentation of references at Jehovah's Witnesses[1], the history of Wladimir Bravo's talk page for their inappropriate actions regarding changing my previous comments, as well as the history of my userpage where the user impersonated an admin by posting a 'blocked' template. A vandalism intervention notice has already been placed.--Jeffro77 (talk) 22:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Radon210. You have new messages at Tyw7's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 22:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Account creation

Can you give me a brief tutorial on the account creation process? Like how can I know the password the user want, etc. In addition, I think I have messed some process up. --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 03:06, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, no problem. You should probably start by reading the documentation and if you're still confused after that, feel free to come back to this page and ask me any specific questions that you'd like to have answered. As for the question regarding passwords you should leave the password field blank and click "by email" (make sure you are logged in while creating accounts). Alexfusco5 00:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 07:26, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

ACC account creation interface tool

Hi. Thanks for giving me access to the ACC account creation interface tool. I can't access to IRC on my Mac web browser so I wouldn't be able to chat with you guys. :>) BejinhanTalk 02:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I visited that one. BejinhanTalk 03:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

ACC: db error

Hi, which request was this on? Stwalkerstertalk ] 06:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Request 34018, "Sweet40" Alexfusco5 12:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 00:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

ACC adminship

Hi. I'm interested in becoming an ACC admin later. What is the criteria to becoming an ACC admin? BejinhanTalk 05:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

To be trusted by another admin but we really aren't promoting anyone at this time. Alexfusco5 15:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 31 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 14:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

note

Thank you for caring re: my loss. DS (talk) 12:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

No problem, and no thanks necessary. I hope you feel better soon :) Alexfusco5 21:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

Incivility

This comment[2] was not acceptable, and has been deleted. In the future, please try to maintain a more civil tone, thanks. --Elonka 20:28, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Ok that is fair enough thanks for the notice Alexfusco5 21:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

File source problem with File:Windows Neptune Desktop.png

Thanks for uploading File:Windows Neptune Desktop.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 10:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

I just converted it to png from jpeg and thus I don't know the source. You probably want to contact another uploader Radon210 11:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

Template for deletion

Friendly heads-up {{Imagemap}} is deprecated and nominated for deletion. It has been superceded by changes to the File namespace and I wanted to let you know, since you have a transclusion on your userpage or user talk. If you need to respond to this message, please do so on my talk. —Justin (koavf)TCM21:45, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010