User talk:Radiodead77
Actual Proposed Edits for La Morte Amoureuse
[edit]The plot can be read as an allegory in which Clarimonde, a manifestation of Romuald's sexual desires, is the devil luring man to sin through temptation, embodied by her desire to break Romuald’s priestly vows of chastity through seducing him, Romuald’s mutual desire for her, and contrasting descriptions of her as “divine” from a distance and “cold as a serpent’s skin” when touched.
Comments by Damaris Sanchez: Maybe consider explicitly stating Clarimonde's goal and how she accomplishes it. It can help make the sentence more clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orabela (talk • contribs) 05:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Bibliography
[edit]Donald F Brown, “Azevedo’s Naturalistic Version of Gautier’s La Morte Amoureuse,” Hispanic Review 13 (1945): 252-257.
Grant Crichfield, “Decamps, Orientalist Intertext, and Counter-Discourse in Gautier’s Constanstinople,” Nineteenth-Century French Studies 21 (1993): 305-321.
Anne Linton, “Redeeming the Femme Fatale: Aesthetics and Religion in Théophile Gautiers La Morte amoureuse,” The French review 89 (2015): 145-156.
Nigel E Smith, “Gautier, Freud, and the Fantastic: Psychoanalysis avant la letter?,” in Functions of the Fantastic: Selected Essays from the Thirteenth International Conference on the Fantastic in the Arts, ed. Joe Sanders, (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1995), 67-75.
Gerardo Piña, “The Rhetoric of the Fantastic in Late-Victorian Literature,” (PhD diss., University of East Anglia, 2008).
Bettina L. Knapp, Judith Gautier: Writer, Orientalist, Musicologist, Feminist, a Literary Biography (Lanham, MD: Hamilton, 2004). — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.C. Kaplan (talk • contribs) 16:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Comments on works in bibliography: Pay attention to auto-correct, it inserted a mistake in the title of Smith's work. Get rid of Gerardo's work, no dissertations are to be included in this list. Finally, please explain why you included the work by Knapp? — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.C. Kaplan (talk • contribs) 16:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
I included the work by Knapp because the "Colors and Orientalism" section of the article had no sources that confirmed Gautier's penchant for Orientalism. That book mentions it.
Proposed Edits
[edit]“La Morte Amoureuse” as an allegory, as described by Virginia Marino in “The Devil’s Discourse.” Clarimonde represents Romuald’s inner desires, acting as “a personification of his state of mind,” that may or may not have basis in reality. She is an undead vampire, so her existence already embodies the supernatural and, realistically speaking, illusory, and Gautier’s narrative often describes Romuald as being in a state of “hysteria” when in her presence. However, Marino emphasizes that the “overlapping of fantastic and allegorical representations,” must not be seen as a dichotomy, but a fusion of the two modes that “critical thinking must seek to develop a comfortable way of being neither here nor there, but in both spaces at once.” I might need to use another source to make the section more credible.
Response: Your wording needs to be tightened up, as it's currently a little hard to understand, but one solid sentence about Clarimonde as the allegory of Romuald's desires with Marino as the reference is good. What section would you put it in? — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.C. Kaplan (talk • contribs) 17:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Comments by Damaris Sanchez: The beginning of is a pretty long sentence. Consider breaking it down. Elaborate more on Marino. Maybe provide some background information. This is off to a great start! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orabela (talk • contribs) 05:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Radiodead77 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! GABgab 18:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Radiodead77, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)