User talk:Radianti666

MfD nomination of User:Radianti666

User:Radianti666, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Radianti666 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Radianti666 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robofish (talk) 10:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moving the content from one page to another doesn't make the basic issues go away, you know. So I have nominated User:Radianti666/draft1 for deletion, also at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Radianti666. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 23:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Radianti666 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Singularity42 (talk) 02:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, someone by the name of Singularity42 has linked your material to me.DeeCeeVee (talk) 10:39, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--- I don't see how anyone can associate us. Your style is certainly not mine, the use of caps is also not mine. nor his finishing of with questions. Data and research is out there. DeeCeeVee though I agree with your message, the tone is a 'rant' and don't shout, and yes, you anyone can use the information I posted, It's not "exclusively" mine.Radianti666 (talk)