User talk:Rademire2

Alright, what's up.

Before everything blows up, just talk to me for a minute. Why do you think the other editors are acting like nazis? Hopefully we can resolve this and skip the nonsense that will ensue otherwise. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 19:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Frustrating indeed. Do you still have the text for the table? If you do, post it here. What likely happened is they saw it as misplaced or something similar. We just need to figure out where to put it. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 19:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This table, hmm? I must say, it's pretty impressive. Perhaps we could break it up into smaller parts and place the parts in more specific articles?

One more thing, though it seems you may have done this already - bring it up on the talk pages. There's a lot of information here; so just ask for input on where it is needed. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 19:46, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. –MuZemike 19:47, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey?

I was talking to Inferno, Lord of Penguins I thought we were going to sort this out. (that's what he said). I am going to stop my disruptive behaviour, I know it was bad and I am sorry. I have learned my lesson, and do not wish to be blocked from Wikipedia. I have made some good contributions to Wikipedia, it has only been this week end since I started being disruptive. Rademire2 (talk) 22:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rademire2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for being insulting, rude and disruptive, I am sorry

Decline reason:

You've been abusing multiple accounts. This very account follows your blocked account User:Rademire; and you've also been using User:Bro5990. Not good. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rademire2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have never used Bro5990! This is my ONLY account, but I forgot the password to my first account Rademire, so I created Rademire2! If I was trying to create puppet accounts then I would call them differant names. All I have done wrong was act disruptive over the week end, and I am sorry, very sorry. But now this has happend, just becuase I share the same IP address as someone els. I have made good contrabutions to wikipedia, and have never made puppet accounts, I only forgot the password of Rademire and then had to make Rademire2. I dont feel I should be punnished for forgeting a password. But I have never used Bro9550

Decline reason:

I am disinclined to believe this, firstly because there is checkuser evidence against it, and secondly for the reason of all the circumstantial evidence here. Apologies, but I feel you are trying to mislead us, and the evidence is really stacked up against you. The Bro5990 account appeared the moment you were blocked after not being used for months. Taelus (talk) 09:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rademire2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

checkuser evidence? I havent even been able to see that evidence, but I guess its to do with my IP address? I find it it very unlucky I share the same IP address as someone els. As firstly I was blocked for only being disruptive over the week end, and for that I cannot say sorry for enough. However, this IP address has caused people to think I am a puppet account of Rademire and Bro5990. True I forgot the password to log onto Rademire so I created Rademire2 and I have been open about that, It was even written on my user talk page, but I have never used Bro5990. I just wish you were in my situation. Its not uncommon for people in small compact towns to share the same IP address. Bro5990 seams to have loged on yesterday to look at the list of the worlds largest economies, looking for any IMF WEO update. That was on the 12th of April, however I know that the IMF is releasing its WEO on the 14th of April, obviously Bro5990 has come back to wikipedia becuase he knows the WEO is out any day. lol This is post recession, the WEO is going to be a very popular report, we live in interesting times. Also Bro5990 has only been inactive scince january and january was the release of the IMFs mini WEO update, obviously then Bro5990 logs on to wikipedia when new IMF WEOs are released. I wish you would listen, I am sorry for being disruptive, I wont do it again

Decline reason:

I am finding this explanation- that two people who don't know each other are, just by coincidence, making the same edits to the same articles from the same ip address- too implausible to use as a reasoning for unblocking. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ahh, crap.

Gah, I had something urgent to attend to, and I come back to this...really sorry about that. We probably would have been able to avoid this.

Rademire, the situation isn't hopeless here. Just come clean about the other account(s?), don't make any more and we'll likely be able to move forward. You are a good faith editor, and know that I haven't lost hope for you yet. Honesty here does work, and I want you to understand that. I've learned this from my own experiences. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 14:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also as a note to the admins - try and see things through his eyes. He isn't a bad faith editor, he just needs to be shown the ropes. It makes moving forward much easier and far more productive. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 14:27, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be back in a few hours Rademire, so just try and listen to my prior suggestions. Don't give up yet. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 14:27, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]