User talk:Rackabello

Speedy deletion of Cape Cod Needs a Monorail

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Cape Cod Needs a Monorail, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chetblong^{talk to me} 06:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Better Transit for Cape Cod

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Better Transit for Cape Cod, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chetblong^{talk to me} 06:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Better Transit for Cape Cod, you will be blocked. Chetblong^{talk to me} 06:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Corrections" to Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority

Your Recent edit[1] to Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority constituted vandalism and outrageous WP:NPOV pushing. Another editor just reverted it. If your pledge during the AfD to clean up the article is in good faith, please keep your edits constructive. • Gene93k (talk) 06:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better Transport For The Cape... YEAH!!!

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Better Transport For The Cape... YEAH!!!, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Better Transport For The Cape... YEAH!!! is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Better Transport For The Cape... YEAH!!!, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 3 days from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jmlk 1 7 07:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rackabello (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Are you fucking serious? I'm not a vandal, how does bringing to light the fact that a lack of good reliable public transit on Cape Cod is a serious problem equal vandalism. This is bullshit

Decline reason:

Between all the deleted articles and edits like this you are seriously attempting to argue that your edits were constructive? Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 00:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rackabello (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Better transit for the Cape! Better transit for the Cape! YEAH!!!!

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not your soapbox. That, and no unblock reason given. — Kwsn (Ni!) 04:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hey Rackabello, I think it's great what you're doing, advocating for better public transit, but I'm asking you to understand that Wikipedia is a noble project too: to provide, high-quality, free, unbiased information to as many people as possible. It's clear to me that what you're doing is compromising the goals of this noble project, by trying to use it for your advocacy instead of keeping it neutral, a fundament of the project. I mean, who's going to trust an encyclopedia if it's just a receptacle for anyone's opinion? I don't think there's any reason you should have to harm our project in order to forward yours. In fact, don't you think that access to neutral information will forward your goals better, by informing people more? So my request is that you contribute in a way that helps Wikipedia, or at the very least to stop harming it. Thanks much, delldot talk 04:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Due to unblock abuse, your talk page is now protected for 24 hours. Please try to behave upon your return. IrishGuy ^talk 23:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Cape Cod Needs a Monorail, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oxymoron⁸³ 21:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this account will be subject to a longer block.

KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 21:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rackabello (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You guys are a bunch of fucking morons Dont stifle free speech, better transit for the cape is a good cause. I feel like this is just a massive show of power, unblock me now Better transit for the Cape!

Decline reason:

Unblock abuse. — Yamla (talk) 00:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: Block duration extended to indefinite. —Animum (talk) 00:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dig Safe System

I have nominated Dig Safe System, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dig Safe System. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of I'm Not a Chicken, You're a Turkey

I have nominated I'm Not a Chicken, You're a Turkey, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Not a Chicken, You're a Turkey. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 17:23, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Digsafelogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Digsafelogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Userindef

Template:Userindef has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 09:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:VOA-UP-note

Template:VOA-UP-note has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 06:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from user page

Afemai is the name for a group of people living in the northern part of Edo State of Nigeria. Afemai people are the second largest group in the state, and the article about Afemai should be on Wikipedia if the objective of Wikipedia as a free encyclopaedia is to be served without bias. Afemai people are mentioned in Edo state of Nigeria goverment website. So it's rather strange that a person who has no knowledge about the place will suggest the deletion of the article about AFEMAI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by T OSIIYERE (talk • contribs)

MfD nomination of User talk:Rackabello

User talk:Rackabello, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Rackabello and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Rackabello during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. We'll have the full story... at 11! 20:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page was nominated for deletion on 18 April 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.