User talk:RachelAnderson72489

This is RachelAnderson72489's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uplift (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dreamy Jazz were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uplift and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uplift, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RachelAnderson72489! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Uplift

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Uplift has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.travelweekly.com/Travel-News/Travel-Agent-Issues/Buy-now-pay-later-purchase-option-becomes-a-popular-pick-for-travelers. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review GeneralNotability (talk) 15:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirming a request for company wikipedia page

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Good Morning, I want to confirm that a request for an article has been made on behalf of Uplift (https://www.uplift.com) as I am seeing it on this page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Business_and_economics/Companies/T-Z

I am a new marketing team member at the company and as we are not showing up in the Google Knowledge Panel, I came to Wikipedia. I had recently tried to write and submit my own but once that was swiftly deleted I dug a bit deeper and don't want to continue writing/submitting if this request for a page to be created on our behalf is true.

Thank you for your time! -Rachel RachelAnderson72489 (talk) 15:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is an active request recorded at requested articles, but you should be aware that a notice about a funding round is not considered a reference that can support notability. Requested articles are taken up by volunteers, no prediction can be made about when someone will pick your company to try to write an article. When they look at the reference, they may also decide that the request does not meet our requirements and delete it.

Google knowledge panels are gathered from a great many sources; it not something Wikipedia controls.

Attempts to promote your company on Wikipedia will be met with strong resistance. You should focus your efforts elsewhere. 16:10, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello RachelAnderson72489. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:RachelAnderson72489. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=RachelAnderson72489|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 16:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have disclosed my employer. I certainly do not want to appear black-hat so thank you for that insight. For now, after disclosing employment, I will not attempt to create a page or push the subject until it is organically done by other members of the community to avoid any COI. Thank you!

You can still create a draft, as you did before, and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. However, as stated in a warning above, you cannot violate copyright. You may have permission to use Uplift's material, but you are not the publisher of content on Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation is the publisher, and the Wikimedia Foundation has not been granted permission to republish copyrighted content. As someone who works in marketing, you may also find it difficult to write about Uplift in a neutral, non-promotional manner. Also see Wikipedia:Golden rule for a brief overview of what we expect to see before an article can be published here. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]