User talk:Rachealhealing

QUEST GOR SUCCESS IS REAL. WERE IS THE SUCEESSOR

GOD IS THE THE SUCCESSOR THE GLORY OF THE WORLD TO COME AND HE HAVE SPOKEN THROUGH THE PROPHITIC GIS LOGJT WILL SHINE TO ENKINDLE OUR WELL BEEN IN THE FAMILY WERR BROKENNESS JAS BECOME A TRADITION. IS THAT THE QUEST VISA LOTTERU IS THE BEST OPTION.

OLISA VHIMARK Rachealhealing (talk) 14:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong web site

Please do not post material unrelated to Wikipedia on Wikipedia. See WP:NOTBLOG for more information. Thank you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post inappropriate material unrelated to Wikipedia as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. This has now been removed twice. Any further attempts to re-post it or to use Wikipedia as a blog will result in loss of editing privileges. Voceditenore (talk) 07:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

The proposed article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles on fictional subjects should cover their real-world context and contain sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance—not just a summary of the plot. You may wish to add this content to an existing article. As anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are free to do so yourself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rachealhealing/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 13:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rachealhealing, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 13:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft is incomprehensible. It is not clear what it is trying to be about, but it doesn't seem to have a subject. Please stop resubmitting it. Submitting it in this form at a help desk is not useful either. If you continue to submit WP:Patent nonsense, you may be blocked.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rachealhealing/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop posting nonsense. You may be blocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, User:Rachealhealing/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:05, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DatGuy was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rachealhealing/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrative discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Your repeated posting of incoherent irrelevant material on various userpages. The thread is Editor contributions are incoherent and of no relevance or value to Wikipedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for inability to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive way for unknown reasons. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In order to be a part of the English Wikipedia, you need to be able to communicate and participate competently. Your contributions demonstrate that you can not. It isn't personal, it is simply policy. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]