User talk:R radeva

August 2023

Hello R radeva. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:R radeva. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=R radeva|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 331dot, I do not have a financial stake whatsoever in promoting this topic, I am also not going to be receiving any compensation directly/indirectly for the creation of this page, neither financial, nor goods, or services (as I read in the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements you have linked up). I am however an intern at the company - so I do fall in the scope of employee - however I am completely unpaid. Please let me know what to do in this case. Thank you. R radeva (talk) 09:36, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As specifically noted at WP:PAID, unpaid interns count as "paid editors" because an unpaid intern is being compensated with the experience of the work that they will then put on a resume to get a paying job in the future. You are required to make the paid editing disclosure. You should also read conflict of interest and when your boss tells you to edit Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 09:38, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you! I have made the necessary changes. R radeva (talk) 09:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Logo image

I notice your organization logo in your draft and I would ask you if your organization truly wants to release its logo under the Creative Commons license as indicated- this means that anyone can use the logo for any purpose, including commercial, as long as attribution is provided. For example, someone could print the logo onto clothing and sell it and your organization would not be entitled to any money from the sale of its own logo. I see that you didn't upload the image, but I was wondering this. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, yes I just spoke with my organization and they are okay with releasing the logo. Thank you R radeva (talk) 10:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bulgarian Startup Association (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bulgarian Startup Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, R radeva! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bulgarian Startup Association (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lightoil were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bulgarian Startup Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lightoil (talk) 02:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bulgarian Startup Association

Hello, R radeva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bulgarian Startup Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]