User talk:RZimmerwald

Welcome

Hello, RZimmerwald! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

November 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Digwuren. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Bremerenator (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Panama invasion

I am the creator of the Timeline on that page, and I would prefer it if you left the description of the military operations in. They are relevant, and are a superior description to specific events than my timeline is, of those particular events. Would that we had similarly detailed descriptions of, say, the US psychological warfare in Panama prior to the invasion, or other such events, but we do not. As it stands, you are involving my material in an impending edit war. There is no reason that both the timeline of the larger picture and the blow-by-blow depiction of the military operations cannot coexist in the article. So it looks like Rommel's diaries or something, so what? It is all verifiable, it is all relevant to the subject. The fact that it is, ultimately, vacuous and pedantic pseudo-information, an invoice posing as literature, will be apparent in any case to those that are receptive to that fact. Thank you for your consideration of my request. Anarchangel (talk) 07:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFCU initiated

A checkuser request naming you as a party has been initiated. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Anonimu for details. 62.65.237.199 (talk) 18:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Claims in your edit summary

What exactly are you claiming was "resolved" on Talk:Hama massacre when you didn't bother to reply to any part of my comments? AnonMoos (talk) 10:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]