User talk:RJN/Archive 5

"Energy" article

The "Energy" article contains many inaccuracies and incorrect definitions/conclusions. I corrected as many as I could (and more needs to be done) but someone (you?) restored original incorrect article back.

What is going on? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enormousdude (talk • contribs)

Yes, I was 67.177.35.2 yesterday, correcting a few articles (Energy, Kinetic energy, Force, Fermions, Bosons, Quantum statistics, etc) which lacked accurate definitions or were confusing mathematical consequences with mathematical presumptions.

Could you let me know what exactly was incorrect in my corrections (say, about energy or kinetic energy)?

Right now article Energy again has wrong definition of energy (as "ability to do work"). What units does the "ability" have? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enormousdude (talk • contribs)

66.215.204.240 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

I don't think he is a vandal and he seems to have valid WP:AGF reasons for his blanking of article (part)-content. He seems to respond well to coaching and I recommend you can work together on the content and sources thereof - that is if you are interrested in those articles and did not just come accross his edits in RC-Patrol. Agathoclea 11:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawkerbot2 reverting / warnings you

Sorry about that, the bot was down for a while and it didn't see the original vandalism and it looks like an edit conflict screwed up the edit summary there, its something we're working on -- Tawker 07:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Billie Joe Armstrong

Instead of making comments about teenage girls, could you at least share your opinions on why you think the quote should remain on Billie Joe Armstrong's page? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starla Dear (talk • contribs)

Further information

why do you consitently change the see also to further informtation AND see aslo. i dont see other city sites with two different wordings that mean the same thing. it looks like #### and unproffestional. urban909

Houston pic

RJN, the pic in the Houston infobox looks gloomy and depressing. It looks like it is about to storm. The previous pic with the green grass and blue sky looks much better! Postoak 22:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SL

Great job on the Sugar Land images :) -therearenospoons 03:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Is" to "Are" and "Was" to "Were" dispute

Could you please explain why you are changing those nouns on the music articles you reverted? Mike Garcia 00:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

thank you. i appreciate it! Wiki amateur 06:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sugar Land, Texas People and culture

Thanks for adding those sources -- that's definitely preferable over "you would know . . . if you were to live here," since your personal experiences aren't really what WP is about. 02:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)