User talk:RIP B1058/Archives/2024/July
Don't skip AMOS-6
[edit]I noticed several of your edits were removing AMOS-6 and instead talking about CRS-7. AMOS-6 is still the last failure that Falcon 9 had, not CRS-7. Ergzay (talk) 07:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Na na @Ergzay, you are wrong. I was also wrong earlier. Read this note on https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches_(2010%E2%80%932019)#cite_note-149 that states Since it was a pre-flight test, SpaceX does not count this scheduled attempt in their launch totals. Some sources do consider this planned flight into the counting schemes, and as a result, some sources might list launch totals after 2016 with one additional launch.
- So why we need to count it in spacex failure streak? —🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 08:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- So should we revert back in List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches (2010–2019) @Ergzay? Even that page doesn't count Amos 6 in no of launches else today was launch no 355. —🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 08:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's just SpaceX numbering for launches, we don't go by SpaceX numbering to determine number of missions since last failure. And SpaceX does consider it a failure, just go listen to how Shotwell talked about it in interviews around that time period. They just don't count it as a numbered flight. Ergzay (talk) 10:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- I just found Guinness Book of World Records. Since their records are officialrecords and world follows them, they are counting since Amos-6 so going by it. —🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 10:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's just SpaceX numbering for launches, we don't go by SpaceX numbering to determine number of missions since last failure. And SpaceX does consider it a failure, just go listen to how Shotwell talked about it in interviews around that time period. They just don't count it as a numbered flight. Ergzay (talk) 10:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)