User talk:RIP B1058/Archives/2024/January
Disambiguation link notification for January 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian satellites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polarization. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ok doing RIP B1058 (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Lunar rover into Rover (space exploration). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 00:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh ok i will remember it in future i rarely miss these details extremely sorry @DanCherek RIP B1058 (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, no worries. DanCherek (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cygnus NG-21 (January 24)
[edit]- Draft:Cygnus NG-21 may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, RIP B1058!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBritinator (talk) 12:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
|
- @TheBritinator This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I have discussed this during my IP editor era at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:122.187.144.98#Copying_within_Wikipedia . I hace linked this ip address in my user home page. The claim of being from https://handwiki.org/wiki/Engineering:Cygnus_NG-18 is false as this article originated from who made Cygnus NG-18 during https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Cygnus_NG-18&oldid=1016883973 in english Wikipedia and then someone copied it during Cygnus NG-19 and it was copied by me during making my Cygnus NG-20 and its draft and then i made this draft using this Cygnus NG-20 page so indirectly done. I had cedited the copying within wikipedia in this edithttps://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Cygnus_NG-20&oldid=1175152154 on Cygnus NG-20. Evdn if the article really originated from handwiki (no chance afaik as its a sister website of English Wikipedia, Wikipediais main website) as @Beatgr RIP B1058 (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- See the handwiki version says {{Sourceattribution|Cygnus NG-18}} at the end of that page that tells us that the original source is Cygnus_NG-18 that has public domain label so it means that this is a tottally false, erroneous speedy deletion claim and the article from a templatessource code that is written and accepted during Cygnus NG-18, Cygnus NG-19, Cygnus NG-20 must not be resisted for thus draft. RIP B1058 (talk) 13:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. Apologies for the confusion, @RIP B1058. TheBritinator (talk) 15:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, sorry I've my words were high pitched or irritating if really RIP B1058 (talk) 17:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. Apologies for the confusion, @RIP B1058. TheBritinator (talk) 15:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- See the handwiki version says {{Sourceattribution|Cygnus NG-18}} at the end of that page that tells us that the original source is Cygnus_NG-18 that has public domain label so it means that this is a tottally false, erroneous speedy deletion claim and the article from a templatessource code that is written and accepted during Cygnus NG-18, Cygnus NG-19, Cygnus NG-20 must not be resisted for thus draft. RIP B1058 (talk) 13:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)