User talk:RIP B1058/Archives/2024/February

AfC notification: Draft:Progress MS-26 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Progress MS-26. Thanks! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your edits to Ingenuity (helicopter)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ingenuity (helicopter), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 111.82.30.68 (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

What did i do bro? @111.82.30.68 —RIP B1058 (talk) 03:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

I am a regular editor of that page. I was the first who wrote on Ingenuity's fate nicely on that page. This is a false claim thar i am vandalising. I have contributed many spaceflight articles why will i vandalize? Even if I did such act say it I will avoid in future. —RIP B1058 (talk) 03:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

@The Herald thus guy is bullying me. Just arrived on wiki at 9 Feb 2024. —RIP B1058 (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

I have warned them for the misuse of warning templates. Also, I'd suggest you to start using edit summaries to explain every edit you make. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Okmi will add them i forgot adding them with the flow of time. Thanks you remembered me about edit summary again —RIP B1058 (talk) 10:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Progress MS-26 (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Progress MS-26 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

@The Herald its from a draft templatish source code of progress mission pages like earlier ones. Plaes list the things missing here. If adding citations will help, then just adding them. —RIP B1058 (talk) 10:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

@The Herald please approve or attest tell the flaws still there. Launch is nearing on 15 February so it's must be present for its launch. —RIP B1058 (talk) 06:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

@Liz I noticed you removed CSD tag in redirect i asked for deletion so can you just tell the issues needed if any that you spotted for enriching my understanding of flaws there? —RIP B1058 (talk) 06:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Space Development Agency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page USSF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Restored —RIP B1058 (talk) 05:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

I like your signature! Happy editing :) —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 02:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Appreciated actually i made this account as a remembrance to Falcon 9 B1058 and there I posted

After that while my vigorous editing I saw many signatures like yours and I sought to make one but i remembered, "ok nasa public domain logos were the exceptional qualities of booster b1058 so while making the signature i used them."

Seriously this sweet responses from editors is mind blowing. I thought someone would coming running on my talk page saying, "Hey, stop including nasa public domain logos in your signature. Its clogs up the file usage history (the list of pages using the file in commons file page) whenever you speak". :-D:-D:-D:-D:-D (laughing) —RIP B1058 (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Moon, etc.

Hello. You are probably aware, but if not, proper names such as Moon, Sun, Earth, Solar System, Galactic Center, etc. are uppercased on Wikipedia. Thanks. That said, it's been enjoyable reading your edits, and thank you for adding and enhancing such good material to Wikipedia's space and spaceflight collection. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Oh extremely sorry will mind it from now. —RIP B1058 (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

No need to be sorry, extreme or otherwise. Also like your illustrated signature. Enjoy your WikiRuns. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:27, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for my admiration mate. —RIP B1058 (talk) 13:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Seriously this sweet responses from editors is mind blowing. I thought someone would coming running on my talk page saying, "Hey, stop including nasa public domain logos in your signature. Its clogs up the file usage history (the list of pages using the file in commons file page) whenever you speak". :-D:-D:-D:-D:-D (laughing) —RIP B1058 (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Btw nice to see you @Randy Kryn. I have a doubt. How does COSPAR id template works see there's an issue of IM-1 cospar id on List of lunar probes. Please fix it. —RIP B1058 (talk) 13:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

I have no idea, all of that is greek to me (sorry if you are Greek). I'm not code or coding template-efficient or knowledgeable. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Òh just remembered [https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/display.action?id=IM-1-NOVA IM-1-NOVA] exists —RIP B1058 (talk) 13:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Mars 3

I just saw a tweet https://twitter.com/deltaIV9250/status/1761582689088307351 saying slim and im-1 as partial failure i admitted that and corrected them as full success and asked for page protection of List of missions to the Moon infact they are currently operational.

But communications failure is a partial success is failure? @Randy Kyrn

asking to know that if i correct Mars 3's partial success to success is it good? It will be controversial as its an insult to Beagle. So my mind is puzzled for this.(So much so that my words are coming out in a puzzled manner) please help out @Randy Kryn (Scott Manley replied to the above tweet for Mars 3 https://x.com/DJSnM/status/1761819521873310069?s=20) if possible show the success criteria of Mars 3. Landing like Venus probes and slim or work something out(in steady state like most landers or tilted like IM-1 mission)? —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 10:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I'm not an expert, and Wikipedia goes by sources, and in this case Mars 3 seems a partial success (but what a huge "partial", being the first craft to successfully soft land on Mars) because of the quick loss of contact. Success would have been full-operational tech and data readouts, a deployed and functioning ski-rover, and adequate photography. Mars 3 is among the greatest "forgotten" missions, thanks for keeping attention on it. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

So your "full-operational tech and data readouts" includes or excludes landing orientation? Common masses are saying slim and im-1 partial failure by orientation, weren't they wrong??@Randy Kryn —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 12:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

The IM-1 call of 'success' or 'partial success' seems too early to be made. They certainly have to go back to the drawing board to assure that the next probes land and stays upright, but, again, the fact of a soft-landing carries its own success. If the importance of landing orientation turns out to be pertinent to mission objectives, then partial. But give it until the end of mission (lunar night) to check results and, of course, sources. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

importance may depend on if its blocking payload, in case of slim no such and in case of im-1 a passive art sculpture of 125 moons. But this art sculpture is more closer to moon so over achieved (hehehehe). In case of sample return/crewed a failure since ascent vehicle lost ability to launch if not corrected orientation, but this is uncrewed mission.@Randy Kryn —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 13:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

So what to with slim as it is overachiever by surviving a lunar night, in our terms, its extended mission, so its a sucess? —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 13:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Just as i wrote this on Twitter jaxa showed a slim post landing image https://twitter.com/SLIM_JAXA/status/1762094730324902120 —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 13:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Oh some complain that sensors,etc are broken like engine bell lose on slim they must see Hayabusa so much failed but on completion of mission it's success —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 13:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Sources will speak on success-failure, and Slim "waking up" again will benefit its reputation. I like your comment on the Koons' statues being closer to the surface, Jeff Koons has his fans and they would enjoy hearing that. Have you seen the Fallen Astronaut page? A 53-year-old statue on the Moon's surface. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Oh shittttttt!!! I know but i thought its a plaque and on your note i got another ciew of it to find the baby mannequin of fallen astronaut. Btw i stated scott's words, no personal comments, hehe. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 13:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SpaceX CRS-30 has been accepted

SpaceX CRS-30, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 14:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 14:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Ajit Krishnan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Twitter is not a reliable source. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Ok @Jeraxmoira since Twitter is unreliable, I have a suggestion, comments if it's good. Are all the four pages, Ajit Krishnan, Shubanshu Shukla, Angad Prathap and Prasanth Nair (astronaut) in its current form fit for Wikipedia? If not, tell I have many administrative as friends, I feel to send the pages to draftspace. Personally I have worked out and made quality articles like the current draft Draft:SpaceX CRS-30 waiting for approval from draftspace. So I will like if the pages are sent to draftspace and cite back in refined form. Please give your feedback. We have ample amount of time as it will fly in late 2025, no haste. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 13:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

It should not be moved to draft space as there is an {{under construction}} tag placed on those articles. At this point, I don't think any of those articles pass WP:GNG and I believe this is a case of subjects notable only for one event. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Also i have seen ru wiki, it wiki, protuguese wiki to be masters in astronaut Biographies. I made many expansions using translations as in my Aleksandr Gorbunov, Marina Vasilevskaya, Alexander Grebenkin, Tang Shengjie, Jiang Xinlin, etc. So I hope for a better version to be available in any of those wiki. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 14:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

@Jeraxmoira sadly, there are some Biographies like https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/celebrities/story/gaganyaan-astronaut-prasanth-nair-my-husband-malayalam-actor-lena-2507867-2024-02-27 but are copyrighted. Hoping for isro and spacefacts.de websites to update for us or wait for future. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 16:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your signature

Images are not allowed in signatures. Please remove the images from yours. Primefac (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Those are public domain logos, why wouldn't they be allowed, especially if appreciated by other editors? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

WP:SIGIMAGE explicitly prohibits them. Primefac (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

I sensed it and told you @Randy Kryn beforehand yesterday. Is it OK now please tell once, @Primefac@Randy Kryn. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 10:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Meatball is hard to copy and i cant find any emoji version of it @Randy Kryn, if you find please tell me. VSVN is rotated version of .—🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 10:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't know about emojis, only use them on the phone and not internet. Too bad though, because you arranged the two images in an appealing signature, but I can see the point. If images were allowed it'd be the wild west (especially with copyright) and most wouldn't be as well organized as yours. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Emojis are allowed under the above clause and many profilic editors utilize them. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 10:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Clause clearly says, "Images in signatures give undue prominence to a given user's contribution".@Randy Kryn—🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 10:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I hope you find an emoji to use so no complaints emerge. I that one you're using now? Randy Kryn (talk) 11:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

One for headstone is emoji. Read this page:Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#RfC:_disallowing_new_signatures_obsolete_tags @Randy Kryn —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 11:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Thousands of editors use them. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 11:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Sound good. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Primefac (talk) 17:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Appreciated —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 18:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Primefac, I need to learn about Afd as you said here i have 0 knowledge and its true, can you suggest articles on Wikipedia to learn. Our discussion on this is here. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 03:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

For more information about WP:AFD, you will probably want to read about the deletion process. That should get you started. Primefac (talk) 06:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Noice —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 11:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Progress MS-26 (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Geardona were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Progress MS-26 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Geardona (talk to me?) 00:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@Geardona hi but sorry I dont care of that draft now. I was working on that draft for approval but @Lazaro Fernandes of his routine behaviour over many pages, without caring if a draft is already there just made a overriding mainspace page as you see here. Since now my draft was of no use so i merged the contents as you see here. Then i nominated my file for deletion many a times, but @Liz declines saying it's not from original creator called 122.187.144.98. This is my ip address and I used it before making my account. To create a link I mentioned it on my home page. So @Geardona I request you to delete the page. I can just log and do use that ip address, but don't want it. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 03:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Let me see what I can do. Geardona (talk to me?) 11:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 11:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

I cannot delete it myself, I am not an admin. Let me see if I can get it deleted though. Geardona (talk to me?) 11:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Ok —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 16:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Seems like your best shot is placing the draft at Wikipedia:MFD and while there request a wikipedia:HISTMERGE to the main space article.  Thanks Geardona (talk to me?) 11:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Moot point, deleted by another administrator. Geardona (talk to me?) 11:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Ok —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 16:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)